Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 12, 2004 - Regular Meeting <br />Page 4 of I~ <br /> <br />Legal Advertisement: Affected property owners were notified of the proposed change via a letter sent from <br />Maggie Ketcham, Seminole County Addressing, on March 26, 2003. (A copy of Ms. Ketcham's March <br />26, 2003 letter is attached to and made a part of these minutes.) <br /> <br />Staff Presentation: Chief Pavlis stated Ordinance 04-1128 provides for the name change of a segment of <br />State Road 436 to improve public safety responses to that area. The ordinance is necessary pursuant to City <br />Code. Ms. Ketcham, Seminole County Addressing, came forward and requested favorable action on <br />Ordinance 04-1128. Mr. Clifton suggested changing the name to something that identifies the area as being <br />part of Casselberry. Mr. Clifton noted the public safety concerns would still be addressed by the <br />renumbering and change of name, whether that change was East Altamonte Drive or Casselberry Boulevard. <br /> <br />Public Hearing: Mayor Pronovost asked if there was anyone in the audience that wished to speak either for <br />or against Ordinance 04-1128. The following individuals came forward: <br /> <br />1) John Cassclberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, spoke in opposition to Ordinance 04-1128. <br /> <br />2) Kerry Beth Stoddard, 20 Old Barn Way, spoke in opposition to Ordinance 04-1128. <br /> <br />No one else came forward. Mayor Pronovost closed the public heating. <br /> <br />Commission Discussion: Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of renaming State Road 436 within <br />the Casselberry City lirrfits and potential impacts to the affected businesses. Ms. Ketcham stated should the <br />City decide to change the name of the requested segment to anything other than East Altamonte Drive, the <br />affected property and business owners would have to be notified again, since they were originally notified <br />of the change a year ago and have already been utilizing the new East Altamonte addresses for some f~me. <br />Consensus of the City Commission was to modify Ordinance 04-1128 renaming the entire stretch of State <br />Road 436 within the city limits to identify Casselber~ with the name Casselberry Boulevard. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Commissioner Hart moved to modify Ordinance 04- <br />1128 to reflect Casselberry Boulevard instead of East <br />AItamonte Drive and to impose the name change to the <br />entire stretch of State Road of 436 within the city <br />limits. Motion was seconded by Commissioner <br />Doerner. Motion carried unanimously by roll callvote. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote of the City Commission: <br /> <br /> Commissioner Doerner - Yes; Commissioner Cook - Yes; Commissioner Hart - Yes; Mayor <br /> Pronovost - Yes. Motion passed 4 - 0. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Commissioner Doerner moved to continue the first <br />reading of Ordinance 04-1128 to the April 26, 2004 <br />City Commission meeting. Motion was seconded by <br />Commissioner Hart. Motion carried unanimously by <br />roll call vote. <br /> <br /> <br />