Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Commission Meeting <br />January 23, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />The City Clerk stated that proposed costs for duplicate tape and research under Services need s to <br />be deleted. These services relate to public records requests and are addressed by State Statutes. <br /> <br />AMENDED MOTION: <br /> <br />Moved by Commissioner Colleen S. Hufford to amend <br />her main motion to include a footnote indicating that <br />the fees only pertained to Planned Unit Development <br />Residential and the deletions under Services regarding <br />public records, duplicate tapes and research. The <br />amended motion was seconded by Commissioner Linda <br />Hart and carried unanimously by voice vote. (5 - 0) <br /> <br />9. Consent Al!enda <br /> <br />A. Minutes of City Commission Meeting of January 9, 2006 (Removed) <br /> <br />10. Old Business <br /> <br />A. Unicorp Development Project Extension to February 13, 2006 <br /> <br />Mr. Stampfler presented a request dated January 12, 2006, from Mr. Lee J. Mahar, C.E.O. of Unicorp <br />National Developments, Inc. for a continuance of the proposed project for development of the IS-acre site <br />on Triplet Lake Drive and U.S. Highway 17-92. Mr. Maher requested the item be rescheduled for February <br />13,2005. Mr. Stampfler stated that he was in productive discussions with Unicorp and recommended the <br />request for continuance. <br /> <br />Audience InDut: <br /> <br />Mr. John Casselberry, 700 S. Lost Lake Lane, stated that Unicorp should have been in attendance <br />to respond to questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Jon Miller, 380 Jefferson Drive, representing State Representative Rick Keller's Office, reserved <br />comment until the February 13,2006 meeting. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Moved by Commissioner Susan Doerner to approve the <br />extension for the Unicorp Project and reschedule for <br />the February 13, 2006 meeting as req uested. The <br />motion was seconded by Commi ssioner Colleen S. <br />Hufford and carried unanimously by voice vote. (5 - 0) <br /> <br />There was Commission discussion regarding the status of the Concord Center Property and the <br />relation it may have with the Unicorp Project. Mr. Stampfler indicated this would be a matter for <br />discussion at the February 13,2006 meeting. <br />