My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PZ 04/10/2024 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
>
P & Z Minutes Archives
>
2024 P & Z Minutes
>
PZ 04/10/2024 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2025 2:32:17 PM
Creation date
2/18/2025 2:32:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
4/10/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning & 'Zoning Commission/ <br />Local Planning Agency Minutes <br />April 10, 2024 <br />Page <br />The applicant is seeking to make the zoning designation consistent with its current FLUM of Medium <br />Density Residential. The current zoning is R-12.5 (Low Density Single -Family), which is inconsistent per <br />ULDR Section 2-4.2. All the adjacent properties on the west side of the water way, among others in the <br />surrounding area, have a FLUM designation of Medium Density Residential. The proposed rezoning to <br />RMF -13 (Medium Density Multifamily) resolves the inconsistency by making the land entitlements <br />consistent according to our Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned previously, immediately to the east is a <br />waterway that is City owned, and to the west are residential homes followed by condos. The proposed <br />amendment to the Zoning Map is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Policies and <br />Objectives, Objective FLU 1. Coordinate Future Land Use, Policy FLU 1.2. Medium Density Residential, <br />Policy FLU 5.1. Mandatory Utility Hook Up. <br />Staff has considered the surrounding property future land uses and zoning and finds that a zoning <br />designation of RMF -13 is appropriate. The purpose of RMF -13 per our ULDR states that the intent of the <br />zoning district is to act as a buffer between low density residential areas and more intense development. <br />The proposed plan, which will be submitted as a minor site plan, indicates that the maximum the .85 -acre <br />property can accommodate is I1 dwelling units. Further, the proposed plans maintain a residential <br />appearance and thus, have the potential to increase ad valorum revenue. The property also acts as an <br />appropriate buffer between the existing LDR and multifamily properties. That said, while no new <br />development is proposed, the applicant intends to apply for a minor site plan to add three more dwelling <br />units within the existing garages. <br />Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of case number ZMA <br />24-04 to the City Commission, based on the staff report and the testimony and evidence presented, that the <br />request meets the applicable provisions of the ULDR and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan <br />as per the written findings in the staff report. <br />Discussion: Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission asked questions of staff. Edmund Bakalla, <br />Chairman asked if there was a representative present to speak to this item. Valerie Herrel, 1450 Wald Road, <br />Orlando, came forward and addressed the Commission. <br />Audience Participation: Chairman Bakalla asked if there was anyone in the audience to speak about this <br />item. Several residents came forward to speak about this item. <br />Mr. Jaron Brownell, 319 Seminola Boulevard, addressed the Commission and voiced his concerns about <br />the proposed zoning amendment. <br />Ms. Michelle Brownell, 319 Seminola Boulevard, addressed the Commission and voiced her concerns <br />about the proposed zoning amendment. <br />Discussion: The commission discussed this item at length. Mr. Bryan stated his concerns and opposition <br />to the proposed zoning amendment. <br />MOTION: Ms. Stanley moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the <br />City's Local Planning Agency, recommend approval of case number ZMA 24- <br />04 to the City Commission, based on the staff report and the testimony and <br />evidence presented, that the request meets the applicable provisions of the <br />ULDR and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan as per the written <br />findings in the staff report. Mr. Bryan voted nay. The Commission was polled. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.