CE 05/09/2019 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Raley stated it is a demo only to comply with what Code Compliance was asking for, then an engineer will have to come in. VIr. Campbell stated if the respondent stated they will have the violations corrected, then the 60 days should be fine. Finding of fact: The Special Magistrate made a finding in CE-18-002993, 433 Bridle Path to impose a violation on all of the violations giving 60 days to cure the violations. If the violation are not cured within 60 days (July 8, 2019), the respondent will come back to the Special Magistrate for consideration to impose a $250.00 per day fine. Another hearing will be held on July 11, 2019 to determine compliance. CE-19-000258 873E 436 SR #891 ® Extermination, SHC 307.5 1994 ED ® Roof, gutters, downspout maintenance, ULDR Section 3-10.3.a.4 Mark Campbell, Code Compliance Supervisor read case history into record. The property was found to be in violation on January 30, 2019. The City requests a correction date of June 8, 2019. If no compliance by June 8, 2019, then a fine of $250.00 per day should then be imposed for each day of non-compliance thereafter. The City requests a subsequent hearing date of June 13, 2019 to determine compliance. Mr. Campbell advised that the respondent would need additional time. The Special Magistrate asked if staff supports the additional time. Mr. Campbell stated yes. The Special Magistrate asked if the damage was due to an event like a hurricane or was it an ongoing event. Mr. Campbell stated is ongoing. There has been multiple attempts to find the leak. Discussion. Barry Walker, attorney for landowner Rio Bello Investments. Mr. Walker presented documents for consideration, a history of all repairs made, each time there was a complaint of roof leak Collis roofing or another contractor was sent out. Mr. Walker stated the landowner was not ignoring the problem. The Special Magistrate labeled the documents presented as composite exhibit A, relating to repairs on the property. Mr. Walker stated it was not like the property owner was ignoring the problem. The Special Magistrate asked how long the problem has been going on. Mr. Walker stated the property owner and this tenant are involved in litigation over something else. The complaints to the City came after the litigation was underway. The tenant put up a sign, which was a code violation, the landowner got cited and had to pay the fine to the city. It was requested of the tenant that they pay back the money; the tenant did not want to pay and said if I do, I will complain about the roof leak to the City. Mr. Walker advised that Collis Roofing cannot find the leak and told them they will need a whole new roof. An $180,000.00 contract was signed with Collis Roofing, to replace the roof. The Special Magistrate entered composite exhibit B, contract with Collis Roofing. Mr. Walker stated he would be looking at a 90-day time frame for compliance and will keep in contact with the Code officer during the process. If the roof cannot be finished in the 90 days, they will come back and request more time. The Special Magistrate asked if there was anyone else in the audience that wished to speak. 31 Page