My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04/10/2023 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2023 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 04/10/2023 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2023 4:31:16 PM
Creation date
6/27/2023 4:31:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
4/10/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRV CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 10, 2023 — Regular Meeting <br />Page G of 11 <br />changes for Fiscal Year 2024, the timeframe is quite tight due to what is necessary to get the changes on <br />the proposed tax bill in November. <br />Dr. Brock advised that the four fee increase scenarios developed in the Study were as follows: <br />1- Maintaining the status quo by not doing any additional improvements, but just trying to cover what <br />is currently being done <br />2- Tier 1 projects only <br />3- Tier I and 2 projects only <br />4- Tiers 1, 2 and 3, plus base level need for maintenance and rental, etc. <br />The revenue expected to be received based on the current fee of $31.88 per ERU (equivalent residential <br />unit) is $31.88, so the typical home pays approximately $32 per year for street] ighti ng. This generates <br />revenues of approximately $388,000. The base budget need if no improvements are made that are <br />mentioned in the Needs Study is estimated to be approximately $445,000 and includes some projects that <br />are already underway and projected to be done, so with just that, the fee would have to be increased by <br />approximately $5.00 just to break even going forward, approximately a 15% increase. Tier 1 spread evenly <br />over ten years would be an increase of approximately $10, bringing the fee to $42.52, which would still be <br />under the $42.84 upper cap established in the previous study to account for inflation over a ten-year period, <br />which would be approximately a 33% increase. The options for Tier I and Tier 2 would equate to <br />approximately a $14 increase, and all three tiers would equate to approximately a $20 increase annually for <br />the ten-year period. Staff is looking for guidance from the City Commission as to which of the four <br />scenarios are preferred moving forward, and due to the tight schedule for getting updates enacted for Fiscal <br />Year 2024 and getting those changes included in the tax bill in November, staff is hoping to bring the formal <br />study to the City Commission at the end of June, present the normal preliminary rate resolution at the end <br />of July and then the normal final resolution with the updated assessment at the end of August. Then <br />everything would have to be sent to the County no later than September 15i1, to be effective for the upcoming <br />property tax bill. The last study was conducted in 2014 and although that study allowed for the City <br />Commission to make annual increases since that time, there did not appear to have been a need, so no <br />increases have been made in approximately nine (9) years. However, costs are now creeping up with some <br />of the improvements that have been made, and with inflationary impacts. <br />Budget Impact: There is no impact on the City Budget at this time, but guidance from the City <br />Commission will influence the proposed FY 2024 Budget relative to street lighting. <br />Recommendation: City staff is seeking feedback from City Commissioners on the next steps regarding a <br />potential update to the City's Street Lighting Assessment Program. <br />Audience Participation: The following individuals came forward to address this item: <br />1. Bill Hufford, 527 Queens Mirror Circle, thanked the City Commission for having the study <br />done, but expressed some concerns about moving ahead without being sure that more street <br />lighting would actually solve the traffic and crime issues shown by the data. <br />2. Colleen Hufford, 527 Queens Mirror Circle, also thanked the City Commission for bringing <br />this discussion forward and agreed there was a need for more lighting in some of the <br />communities but asked the City Commission to also be mindful of the City's many trees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.