My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09/12/2022 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2022 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 09/12/2022 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2022 2:24:41 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 2:23:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
9/12/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of September 12, 2022 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 8 of 25 <br />4. Al Farrar, 522 Queens Mirror Circle, expressed concerns about the proposed change in density <br />from 30 to 80 units per acre and the increase in floor area ratio and what he felt would be the <br />detrimental effect these changes could have on the City's green spaces. <br />5. Paula Wally, 7007 Arcadian Court, Mount Dora, stated that she was considering moving into <br />the area and opening a small business; however, as a potential small business owner in the City, <br />she had concerns about the City allowing large retail establishments such as BJ's Wholesale to <br />come into the area. <br />6. Bill Hufford, 527 Queens Mirror Circle, spoke in favor of increasing density, but expressed <br />concerns about whether increasing from 30 to 80 units per acre was too much. He added that <br />he felt it would be important for the City to focus on alternate means of transportation in the <br />area and preservation of the City's green spaces. <br />7. Bertina Nancy Busch, 3540 South U.S. Highway 17-92, agreed that the flyover had been a <br />good start to redeveloping the area into a downtown destination, but felt that the U.S. Highway <br />17-92/State Road 436 intersection should be made into a mini town center, and setbacks and <br />preservation of the green space were critical when developing the area. <br />No one else came forward to address Ordinance 22-1572. Mayor Henson closed the public hearing relative <br />to Ordinance 22-1572. <br />Discussion: A brief discussion ensued during which Ms. Hyson clarified that the reasoning behind the <br />proposed increase in density from 30 to 80 units per acre had been due in part to development interest the <br />City had received, and the information provided by the developers was that 220 units was the minimum <br />needed to make a project economically feasible. Since the City does not have very many large tracts of <br />land and in order to redevelop some of these economically underutilized properties that had remained that <br />way for many, many years, this was the way to increase density to a point where it was financially feasible <br />for a development to come in and supply multifamily development where it could be accommodated. <br />However, this would only take place along the major arterial roads and not encroach into the low-density <br />residential areas. Within the Major Thoroughfare Mixed Use (MTMU) designation, there are two zoning <br />designations, PMX-MID and PMX-HIGH, both of which are PUD (Planned Unit Development) <br />designations which means a concept plan has to be reviewed by the DRC (Development Review <br />Committee), the Planning & Zoning Commission, and the City Commission and in order to establish the <br />setbacks and the landscape buffers there is a PUD Agreement that is part of the concept plan and the <br />rezoning request. Therefore, all of the landscape buffers and acceptable building setbacks are reviewed in <br />advance prior to the development being brought forward for consideration. Also, there are other factors <br />and requirements that have to be met such as adequate utilities and parking, so even if 80 were the maximum <br />number of units allowed, it would not necessarily be the number guaranteed for a project. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Busch moved to approve Ordinance 22-1572 on first reading, <br />as presented. Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Aramendia. Motion <br />carried unanimously by voice vote 4-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.