Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of September 12, 2022 —Regular Meeting <br />Page 13 of 25 <br />Also, during the site plan process there are requirements within this ordinance related to the number of plant <br />units that are required and distance separation from residential uses, so that would be reviewed at the PUD <br />level, if applicable, and then also during the site plan review process. With the performance standards are <br />also hours of operation so that these specific uses would be limited so that they wouldn't be disruptive to <br />nighttime sleep hours, and there would also be requirements for screening. If a PUD rezoning is involved, <br />it would go to the Development Review Committee (DRC), the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z), <br />and the City Commission for site plan review depending on the threshold of the proposed improvements. <br />A minor goes only to the DRC, a major goes to the DRC and P & Z, and a development of community <br />impact goes to the DRC, P & Z, and the City Commission. The City's Code determines that developments <br />of more than three (3) acres within PMX-MID or PMX-HIGH are automatically considered to be <br />developments of community impact and must be reviewed through the City Commission for site plan <br />approval. Each of those site plan review meetings are publicly noticed meetings and agendas are posted <br />prior to the meetings so any interested parties will be aware that those plans are coming up through the <br />different approval stages and can contact staff with any inquiries about progress or requests for additional <br />information. In response to additional expressions of concern from the City Commission regarding the <br />possibility of detrimental visual or noise issues for the adjacent residential communities, City Attorney <br />Reischmann explained that the City already has a section of Code related to noise, but there are also <br />references in the ordinance to noise, and the City's goal is to ensure that there will not be any continuing <br />noise violations at the site. Commissioner Meadows also expressed a concern about operating hours <br />beginning at 7 a.m. which he felt was early for most people to deal with any noise issues, and Ms. <br />Reischmann explained that was an issue that could also be handled through the PUD agreement process. <br />Budget Impact: There is no impact to the City Budget. <br />Recommendation: The City Manager recommended approval of Ordinance 22-1575 on first reading. <br />Public Hearing: Mayor Henson stated this was a public hearing to hear and consider comments and <br />questions regarding Ordinance 22-1575. Mayor Henson opened the floor for public participation. The <br />following individuals came forward to address Ordinance 22-1575: <br />I . Paula Wally, 7007 Arcadian Court, Mount Dora, stated she was a prospective business owner <br />hoping to move into the area, but expressed concerns about the right type of growth in the <br />City. She stated she felt there were still unanswered questions and requested that the City <br />Commission defer voting on this amendment until all the concerns that had been brought up <br />had been addressed. City Manager Newlon advised tonight was only the first reading of the <br />ordinance and it would be heard again and voted on at second reading. <br />2. Bill Hufford, 527 Queens Mirror Circle, stated he supported the noise concerns brought up <br />by the Commissioners, but also suggested there could be some sort of compromise in <br />planning of the project and urged the City Commission to think outside the box relating to <br />this and future commercial development in the City so it would benefit both existing and new <br />commercial establishments. <br />3. Blessing Zander, 130 State Road 436, spoke in opposition to the City bringing large retail <br />businesses into the area as he felt that would have a detrimental effect on small, family- <br />owned businesses. <br />4. Ed Williams, Williams Development Services, 20 East Pine Street, Orlando, stated that the <br />noise issue was very important to the prospective developer of the site and work would be <br />limited to tires and windshield wipers, etc., and would not occur outside in the parking lot or <br />