My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 10/11/2021 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2021 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 10/11/2021 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2022 1:47:40 PM
Creation date
2/21/2022 1:47:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
10/11/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBCRRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of October 11, 2021 - Regular Meeting <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />WITHIN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND <br />AN EFFECTIVE DATE." <br />Notice of Public Hearing: The Notice of Public Hearing relative to second reading of Ordinance 21-1557 <br />was advertised in the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday, September 30, 2021. <br />Staff Presentation: Planner II Christina Hyson stated that Ordinance 21-1557 amends Chapter 94, <br />Waterways, of the City Code of Ordinances which provides regulations for waterways within the City. As <br />many sections within this chapter have not been updated since 1982 an update is needed to comport with <br />state statutes, correct outdated language, provide additional clarification and to add sections that will further <br />protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The first reading of Ordinance 21-1557 <br />was approved by the City Commission on Sept 13, 2021. Based on feedback from the City Commission <br />during the first reading staff made one change to the ordinance prior to second reading which was that <br />Section 94-9(b), Storage of unlicensed and/or inoperable vessels on private property, was deleted to remove <br />confusion. Therefore, storage of a vessel in a residential area would following the existing regulations for <br />recreational equipment in Section 3-10.9. No other changes were made to the ordinance since first reading. <br />Discussion: In response to concerns expressed by Commissioner Albritton regarding evidence of <br />abandonment including vegetation that has grown up to touch the frame, Ms. Hyson advised that with the <br />change made from first to second reading regarding storage being covered under Section 3-10.9, if the <br />vessel was screened either by fencing or landscaping and was not visible from the public right-of-way, a <br />reci(jP_,nt who was unable to mow the grass around i the heat would t, .,o t 1� a b `1 <br />O wa J✓ he g a a. not have to e concerned about t t le vessel <br />being towed as an abandoned or derelict vessel. Discussion ensued regarding various other concerns and <br />related issues, including evidence of abandonment; screening requirements; storage requirements on private <br />property; enforcement measures; requirements of Section 3-10.9; whether seven (7) day notice is sufficient <br />for correction of any violation; concerns about financial burden to residents if vessel is towed; the need for <br />clear evidence of disuse, neglect or abandonment to warrant a hearing before the City's Magistrate; rights <br />of appeal; the fact that the ordinance could be revised in the future if it is found to be too restrictive; access <br />to waterways at night; definitions; lighting on docks; pollution of waterways; and licensure requirements. <br />Budget Impact: There is no impact to the City Budget. <br />Recommendation: The City Manager and the Community Development Director recommended adoption <br />of Ordinance 21-1557 on second and final reading. <br />Public Hearing: Mayor Henson stated this was a public hearing to hear and consider comments and <br />questions regarding Ordinance 21-1557. Mayor Henson opened the floor for public participation. The <br />following individual came forward: <br />1. Rhonda Ovist, 220 South Embrey Drive, expressed concerns about what she perceived as a <br />lack of clarity in the ordinance regarding the meaning of abandonment, screening and <br />licensure, and the possible burden the regulations may be for some residents. <br />No one else came forward to address Ordinance 21-1557. Mayor Henson closed the public hearing relative <br />to Ordinance 21-1557. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.