PZ 01/13/2021 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency Minutes January 13, 2021 Page 4 A brief discussion ensued regarding what would be required to convert the structure to a habitable structure, enforcement of code violations, and adding an additional condition of approval prohibiting electricity and plumbing to the structure. Mr. Phillips asked for a motion to address CU 21-01. Mr. Bakalla made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve case number CU 21-01 based upon the five (5) criteria for conditional use approval, the staff report and the testimony and evidence presented, that the request meets the applicable provisions of the Unified Land Development Regulations and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as per the written findings contained within the staff report, the ten (10) conditions of approval, adding condition eleven (11) that this accessory structure would not include power, water, or plumbing, and Attachments A — D. The motion failed for lack of a second. Mr. Phillips asked for a motion to address CU 21-01. Mr. Hale made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve case number CU 21-01 for an accessory structure greater than 500 square feet at 519 Queens Mirror Circle. The recommendation is based on findings of fact and conclusion of the staff report dated January 13, 2021, the ten (10) conditions of approval, and Attachments A — D. Ms. Divita seconded the motion. The motion passed with a majority vote with Mr. Bakalla casting the dissenting vote. Sixth Item of Business: ZB 20.04: Rezoning at 198 SR 436. A request to amend the Official Zoning Map from CG (Commercial General) to PMX-HIGH (Planned Mixed -Use: High Rise) for the parcel located at 198 SR 436. Ms. Christina Hyson, Planner II, reviewed the information provided in her memorandum dated January 13, 2021 to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission. Ms. Hyson said staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of case number ZB 20-04 to the City Commission, based on the staff report and the testimony and evidence presented, that the request meets the applicable provisions of the Unified Land Development Regulations and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as per the written findings contained in the staff report. In response to the Commission's question, Ms. Hyson explained that PMX-MID and PMX-HIGH are the only two (2) designations that are compatible with the MTMU Future Land Use Designation. Ms. Hyson stated that the applicant selected PMX-HIGH because it allows for a greater impervious surface. She explained that the zoning allows for a greater height, however, the PUD Agreement established the height to a maximum of one story.