P & Z 06/12/2019 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency Minutes June 12, 2019 Page 8 2. The applicant is required to get plat approval for the proposed subdivision of the property into an 8 -unit townhouse community. 3. All remaining DRC comments shall be addressed prior to the issuance of any site permits and building permits. 4. All required local, regional, state, and federal permits shall be obtained before commencement of development. 5. The site plan approval shall be valid for one (1) year. An extension request may be submitted prior to the expiration of this approval. 6. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed or the site plan shall become null and void. In response to the Commission's question regarding the height of the buffer, Mr. Fathelbab stated that a 6 - foot high fence is being proposed for the project. Mr. Fathelbab explained that buffers are measured in width. He explained that a multi -family development located next to another multi -family requires no buffer because there is consistency and compatibility among those uses. Mr. Fathelbab explained that there is a perimeter landscape requirement. He explained that staff reviews the perimeter landscape and buffer requirements and use whichever provides a greater landscape buffer. He said this project requires a 7 '/2 -foot perimeter landscape. Mr. Fathelbab stated that 3 -inch caliper/12 foot tall trees are required on the property. A general discussion ensued regarding tree requirements, prohibited on -street parking, height of other multi- family developments in the area, change to the width of the sidewalk due to location of right of way, type of lighting used for the walking path, the length of the driveway and enforcement of no parking in the driveways. Mr. Henson asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Shane Acevedo, 1817 Lockberry Road, Winter Park, Florida came forward. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Acevedo said that a 6 -foot wood fence is being proposed for the rear of the site. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Acevedo explained there is independent lighting in front of the development and the rear parking area, motion sensors on the buildings and lights along the walkway in the rear to the right of way. In response to the Commission's request to install an 8 -foot fence, Mr. Acevedo said that a 6 -foot fence could be constructed adjacent to the retention pond and an 8 -foot fence could be constructed to the rear (east) of the property.