P & Z 06/12/2019 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency Minutes June 12, 2019 Page 5 In response to the Commission's question regarding any easements, Mr. Bowley stated there were no utility easements located under the deck. Mr. Henson asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Shawn Whitaker, 345 Piney Ridge Road, Casselberry, Florida came forward. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Whitaker stated he grew up in that house and his stepfather built the original deck several years ago. Mr. Henson asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. No one came forward. Mr. Henson asked for a motion to address BA 19-03. Mr. Hale made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the City's Local Planning Agency, approve the variance request BA 19-03 for a deck at 345 Piney Ridge Road based on the two (2) conditions outlined in the June 12, 2019 staff report including Attachments A & B. Mr. Phillips seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Mr. Bowley excused himself from the meeting at 7;10 p.m. Eighth Item of Business: BA 19-02: 547 Lake Howell Road. A variance request to Section 2-5.4 to reduce the side interior lot line setback from 15 -ft. to 10 -ft. and reduce the rear lot line setback from 30 -ft. to 20 -ft. for a proposed 8 -unit townhouse subdivision. Mr. Dean Fathelbab, Planner II, reviewed the information provided in his memorandum dated June 12, 2019 to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Fathelbab said the variance application meets all eleven (11) criteria for granting the variance; therefore, staff supports the variance request as presented. He said if the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to grant the side interior and rear lot line setback variance, BA 19-02, for the property located at 547 Lake Howell Road, the motion should be based upon the Planning and Zoning Commission's findings of fact and conclusions, the staff report dated June 12, 2019, and the three (3) conditions outlined in the staff report. A brief discussion ensued regarding the buffer from the adjoining uses. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Fathelbab explained there was a scrivener's error on the application regarding the size of the requested variance. A brief discussion ensued regarding the placement of the visitor parking in the setback. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Fathelbab stated there is no requirement in the City Code to provide the four (4) visitor parking spaces.