Laserfiche WebLink
CASSGLBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 29, 2019 — Joint Workshop <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />make an informed decision whether to vote in favor of or against the bond referendum; importance of the City <br />not seeking to influence the decision one way or the other; potential for political action committees (PAC's) <br />either in favor of or in opposition to the referendum to become involved in the process; status of the City's tax <br />base, both residential and commercial and the potential for new development, redevelopment and annexation; <br />the fact that, if approved, the bond would be for the total amount decided upon, but spending would occur in <br />increments as improvements are constructed, without the need for approval of the Parks and Recreation <br />Advisory Board and the City Commission each time; and the fact that planned parks improvements funded by <br />other methods will continue to move forward separately from the bond -funded improvements. <br />Audience Participation: The following individuals came forward: <br />Mr. Neil Landgrebe, 451 Lilac Road, spoke in favor of the proposed improvements and <br />suggested that the City should continue to promote development of home ownership in the <br />North Winter Park Drive area near the proposed Wheel Park which would add to the City's <br />tax base. He expressed appreciation to the Board, the City Commission and staff for their <br />work on the proposed park improvements. <br />Mr. Walt Bagley, 614 Doheny Way, expressed concerns about how many voters were in the <br />City who were not homestead property owners and what effect that would have on the <br />referendum election. <br />No one else came forward. <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Meadows, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Kelly <br />Brock advised that the consultants had been requested to deliver revised project cost estimates to staff by May <br />7r' for review prior to their being presented to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board on May 14". <br />Discussion: Discussion continued relating to the bond referendum, including: voters having the final <br />decision on the referendum; effect the economy and other taxing authorities would have on the millage rate; <br />potential for the improvements to increase property values; challenges with communicating information in <br />such a way that it appeals to the City's multi -generational population with varying levels of income; <br />utilization of the town hall meeting format for getting information to the public and timeframe for providing <br />that information; timeframe for determining when the referendum election could be held; coordination with <br />Tallahassee and the Seminole County Supervisor of Elections on the logistics of the referendum election and <br />crafting of an ordinance setting out the details, including election date; determination of whether the <br />referendum question would be placed on a general election ballot vs. a City special election ballot; and the <br />importance of timing of the election to ensure the information is fresh in the voters' minds. <br />The Commission as a whole expressed appreciation to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board for their <br />participation in the process. Commissioner Hufford also expressed appreciation to Mr. Newlon and staff for <br />providing the financial information and potential tax burden to the residents separately to assist in the <br />decision-making process. Mr. Newlon advised that the next step would be to take the cost estimates to the <br />Parks & Recreation Advisory Board for discussion and recommendations which would then be brought back <br />to the City Commission for further consideration. Members of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board also <br />expressed appreciation for the entire process, including the joint meetings and presentations, and were excited <br />about the proposed improvements they felt would add to the quality of life in the community. <br />