My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02/26/2018 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2018 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 02/26/2018 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 7:33:33 AM
Creation date
6/26/2018 7:33:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
2/26/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of February 26, 2018 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />Account Number Account Description Amount <br />Increase: <br />119-0221-524-34-00 Other Contractual Services $145,000 <br />119-0000-389.90-00 Other Non -Operating Source $145,000 <br />Recommendation: The City Manager and the Finance Director recommended approval of Amendment <br />#3 with Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $425,000/year and related Budget <br />Amendment #18-019. <br />Audience Participation: No one came forward to address any item on the Consent Agenda. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Aramendia moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as <br />presented. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Solomon. Motion <br />carried unanimously by voice vote 5-0. <br />8. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Future Agenda Items <br />No items were presented for consideration. <br />B. Municipal Advisory Committee (Metroplan) Report <br />No report. <br />C. Leadership Seminole Board Report <br />No report. <br />D. Mayors/Managers Group Report <br />City Manager Randy Newlon reported that the City of Casselberry had hosted the meeting on Tuesday, <br />February 20th, and the topic of discussion was the question of how each of the member governments felt <br />about the putting a question to the voters on a referendum ballot to raise funds for capital improvements. <br />He stated that the responses were varied based on each government's political philosophy, organizational <br />culture and management style, and making a decision on whether to pursue a bond referendum or not would <br />depend specifically on each government and what would be in the best interests of their specific community <br />and not necessarily what other communities had done. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.