CC 07/25/2016 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION Minutes of July 25, 2016 — Regular Meeting Page 13 of 17 their product. Discussion: Additional discussion ensued regarding cost sharing, possible waiver or reduction of impact fees, or giving of some type of incentives. Mr. Newlon advised that the City Commission could not make any decisions at this meeting regarding incentives, cost sharing or waiver of impact fees, but if the Commission wished to support CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) consideration of any of these options, a CRA meeting could be noticed for a future date. He clarified for Mr. Brown and Mr. Haugdahl that the site was within the City's community redevelopment district and the City Commission served as the Community Redevelopment Agency which made decisions regarding utilizing CRA funds for development incentives of this nature. However, since tonight's meeting was not a noticed CRA meeting, no decisions could be made at this time and no promises made. Mr. Newlon then asked for clarification on the pending motion and whether any amendments needed to be made to include the wall. City Attorney Katie Reischmann advised that the project was at a very technical state of development and everything had already been decided on the site plan which was being presented for approval. She stated that at this point what was needed was just to check to see whether the proposed plan meets City Code. She added that what the Commission was now asking was for the applicant to go beyond the Code requirements, which could get the City into trouble under the new Florida Statute governing this, so she advised the Commission to be cautious in drafting any motion to amend to ensure it did not sound like a violation of the statutes. In response to questions from Commissioner Meadows, Mr. Brown advised he was 100% confident the applicant could move forward on the purchase of the site with the concept that the wall would be defined at a later time. He noted that he understood that any cost sharing measures would have to be determined, and that cost bids and specifications would take time. He stated that the overall premise was the site plan itself and not necessarily the wall, so if they could just get some reasonable assurances that the site plan was approved he felt they would be okay to close on the property. Mr. Newlon asked for clarification if he was referring to the site plan being approved with the provision that the applicant would work with staffto develop a wall concept, and Mr. Brown concurred. Commissioner Solomon and Commissioner Aramendia withdrew their earlier motion and second, respectively, to approve Development of Community Impact Site Plan — Culvers Restaurant Located at Cambridge Oaks Shopping Center (SPR 16-10), subject to the eight (8) conditions recommended by staff in the staff report dated July 13 2016, as presented. MOTION: Commissioner Aramendia moved to approve Development of Community Impact Site Plan — Culvers Restaurant Located at Cambridge Oaks Shopping Center (SPR 16-10), subject to the following eight (8) conditions recommended by staff in the staff report dated July 13, 2016: 1. DRC comments, from the May 12, 2016 meeting shall be addressed prior to City Commission review; 2. All utility lines shall be placed underground (Section 3-10.2(4)). 3. All Public Works issues must be addressed prior to issuance of a site