My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01/26/2015 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2015 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 01/26/2015 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2016 2:31:46 PM
Creation date
3/2/2016 2:31:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
3/2/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CrrY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of January 26, 2015 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 9 of 20 <br />effective January of 2015 and would be in effect for a period often years. He further explained that the City of <br />Casselberry was projected to collect approximately $1.5 million per year which would be used toward certain <br />projects approved by the City Commission and included in a broad interlocal agreement between all the cities, <br />Seminole County and the Seminole County School Board, <br />Mr. Newton advised that Seminole County had an interest in incentivizing the City of Casselberry to speedily <br />complete the reconstruction project on Oxford Road by advancing the funds needed for the project at no <br />interest, rather than the City having to wait for the funds to accumulate from the sales tax. He added that this <br />would be approximately $1.5 million, and Resolution 15 -2696 would approve an interlocal agreement with <br />Seminole County to set out the details relating to the advance of the funds and providing for a promissory note <br />which would be funded back to Seminole County on January 1, 2018. He stated that if the resolution were <br />approved by the Commission, the issue would then be forwarded to Seminole County for consideration by the <br />Board of County Commissioners sometime in February of 2015. He added that once the interlocal agreement <br />was approved by the County he would expect the City to receive the funding by April of 2015, allowing the <br />City to then bid the project out and proceed towards completion. <br />Budget Impact: Approval of the Inter -local Agreement will have no impact on the FY 2015 budget. Upon <br />execution of the promissory note by both parties, a budget amendment will brought forward to recognize the <br />revenue and related expenditure for the construction of Oxford Road. <br />Recommendation: The City Manager and the Public Works Director recommended approval of Resolution <br />15 -2696. <br />Audience Participation: The following individuals came forward to address Resolution 15 -2696: <br />1. Mr. James Fraleigh, 23 Teresa Court, spoke in opposition to Resolution 15 -2696, stating he <br />felt the road did not need to be replaced, the construction would add to traffic congestion in <br />the area, and the project was a waste of taxpayers' money. <br />2. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, voiced some concerns about the <br />intersection at State Road 436 and Oxford Road, stating he felt the City should wait until <br />completion of the flyover at State Road 436 and U.S. Highway 17 -92 before doing any <br />construction on Oxford Road in order to determine what effect the flyover would have on <br />traffic patterns. <br />3. Mr. Robert Phillips, 251 South Triplet Lake Drive, advised he had attended the workshop <br />regarding the Oxford Road project where he was able to view the artistic renderings of the <br />proposed improvements and was encouraged by the work being done and the beautification <br />efforts. He expressed his approval of the project and encouraged the Commissioners to <br />continue moving forward. <br />No one else came forward. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Aramendia moved to approve Resolution 15 -2696, as presented. <br />Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Solomon. Motion carried unanimously by <br />voice vote 5 -0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.