Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of January 26, 2015 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 16 of 20 <br />Public Hearing: Mayor Glancy opened the public hearing relative to Resolution 15 -2693. The following <br />individual came forward: <br />Mr. James Fraleigh, 23 Teresa Court, spoke in opposition to Resolution 15 -2693, stating he <br />felt that residents and business owners in the City should make up the CRA and it would be a <br />conflict of interest for the City Commission to serve in both capacities. <br />No one else came forward.- Mayor Glancy closed the public hearing relative to Resolution 15 -2693. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Aramendia moved to approve Resolution 15 -2693, as amended. <br />Motion was seconded by Commissioner Solomon. Motion carried unanimously <br />by voice vote 5 -0. <br />Discussion: Commissioner Meadows stated he would prefer to have an independent CRA; however with the <br />current difficulties in maintaining a quorum and the fact that this would be only a two -year extension, he felt <br />the Commission serving as the CRA was a logical choice. <br />Motion passed unanimously by voice vote 5 -0. <br />12. OTHER ITEMS <br />A. Board Appointments <br />Planning & Zoning Commission <br />Mayor Glancy advised she had requested a list of volunteer board members noting the terms and expiration <br />dates for each member from City Clerk Donna Gardner, and copies had been provided to each of the <br />Commissioners. She further advised she would like for the Commission to consider new appointments to the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission as opposed to reappointments of existing members, as she felt those <br />members had already served the City in various capacities for many years and she believed it would be good to <br />give other willing citizens an opportunity to serve. <br />Discussion: Discussion ensued about the benefits of both long -term board members and new board members, <br />and how long each ofthe applicants had served the City. Mayor Glancy shared that she had had a conversation <br />with a long -time board member who had indicated a willingness to allow a new applicant to be appointed to his <br />board seat rather than be reappointed. Several of the Commissioners expressed some concerns about the issue, <br />noting that neither age nor length of service should be a deciding factor when reappointing or appointing a <br />board member. Mayor Glancy clarified that her suggestion had not been about age, but only about length of <br />service and allowing "new blood" onto the boards to have an influx of new ideas and to give more citizens an <br />opportunity to serve. Ms. Gardner clarified some points, including the Commission's practice of appointing <br />the alternate to a board as a regular member when a vacancy occurred, and efforts which were being made by <br />staff to reactivate the Lakes Management Advisory Board. She also suggested that a workshop may be needed <br />at a future time to discuss board appointment terms; potential changes to board makeup; and strategies for <br />