My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CE 10/08/2015 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Code Enforcement Hearing Minutes
>
CEB Minutes Archives
>
2015 Code Enforcement Minutes
>
CE 10/08/2015 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2015 7:45:45 AM
Creation date
12/17/2015 7:45:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
10/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Special Magistrate asked Mr. Chappell if his testimony was that he was still running a business at 214 N Griffin <br />Drive. <br />Mr. Chappell stated he hadn't turned a profit and is in the hole, as well as not being able to function due to medication. <br />The Special Magistrate asked the City to explain what was needed. <br />Mr. Bauer explained what was needed to come into compliance. The fee for the license is $ 121.37, then $250.00 that has <br />already been assessed. The property owner is risking being assessed another $250.00 if no compliance by 10/30/2015. <br />Brenda Jones, recording Secretary advised the $250.00 was assessed on April 1, 2015. <br />Mr. Bauer advised a payment plan could be set up for Mr. Chappell. <br />The Special Magistrate asked how a payment plan would be set up for a State assessed penalty. <br />Mr. Bauer advised that the City would collect the money and then pay the State. <br />Mr. Chappell stated he had not been able to work; he wants to pay but needs more time. <br />Mr. Bauer stated that the City has made its position clear and has generated the October 15ffi date and the Magistrate has <br />the power to extend mercy if decides, by extending additional time. <br />FINDING OF FACT: The Special Magistrate made a fording based on testimony and evidence. The property is delinquent <br />as there is no property (business) tax receipt, there has not been for over a year. There is one from the previous year and <br />the current fiscal year. There is undisputed testimony that there is a business running out of the property. There are <br />mitigating factors in regard to the owner's ability to pay. The fact is that to run a business out of the property there needs <br />to be a business tax receipt. The choices are to pay (the BTR) of stop running the business, it doesn't matter if there is a <br />profit made or not. <br />It was found that there is a violation of City Code 26.44, local business tax receipt at 214 N Griffin Dr. It was ordered that <br />the violation be corrected by November 15, 2015 or a fine of $75.00 per day be assessed for each day after November 15, <br />2015. <br />REDUCTION REQUESTS <br />Roof maintenance, ULDR Section 3 -10.3 <br />• CE -14 -01314 480 S Triplet Lake Dr <br />Nathan Johnson Code Compliance Officer, read the case history, current lien amount, $750; Administrative cost, $238.19 <br />(paid); Requested reduction amount; to fees already paid. This City recommended this request be denied, due to repairs <br />exceeding the compliance date imposed by the Special Magistrate of July 25, 2015. The repairs were completed on <br />August 24, 2015 <br />Sam Battistone, 480 S Triplet Lake Dr, stated that when he first spoke about this, the house is 80 years old and there are <br />no plans that can be used to work off of. The damage was much more that originally suspected, then additional work was <br />done that wasn't in the permit. A second permit was then obtained and it did run long. Mr. Battistone stated that when he <br />first spoke with Nathan, he was advised there should be no problem getting an extension but then found that he could not <br />because it already in front of the Special Magistrate. <br />Mr. Battistone advised that due to the road closure Mr. Johnson did have to walk to his home for inspections and that that <br />time would need to be paid for. <br />Mr. Johnson advised that he did make several visits to the property. The City's position was that at the original meeting <br />the City acted in good faith and since a 6 month permit was obtained, a 6 month compliance was given. The compliance <br />date came and went, as well as the permit expiring. <br />2 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.