Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Commission/ <br />Local Planning Agency <br />October 9, 2013 <br />Page 7 <br />the ordinance that was included in the agenda packet has been modified to allow the City Commission to determine the <br />administrative fee to be charged for the utility fee deferment. <br />Ms. Regan requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission provide a favorable recommendation to the City <br />Commission for LPA 13 -09 related to Chapter 86, Utilities as provided in the draft ordinance. <br />In response to the City Commission's question, Ms. Smith explained that there is an application fee that can be <br />imposed by the City Commission. She said the change to the ordinance allows the City Commission to set that application <br />fee by resolution. Ms. Smith said that it is more difficult to change fees that are in the City Code and this change allows the <br />City Commission to set the fee by resolution. Ms. Smith explained that the applicant will apply to the City Commission for <br />the fee deferral and at that time the Commission will determine if the impact and utility fees will be deferred from the time of <br />issuance of the building permit to the certificate of completion. <br />After a brief discussion regarding impact and utility fee deferment, Mr. Meadows asked if there was anyone in the <br />audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. Mr. James Fraleigh, 23 Teresa Court, <br />Casselberry, Florida came forward to speak against this request. Mr. Fraleigh felt that developers didn't care about the <br />community and their bottom line was to make their money and leave. He felt that the developer should be held accountable <br />at the beginning of the development process. He said it is a part of doing business. Mr. Fraleigh was concerned that the <br />developer could walk away from the project and not be held responsible for paying for the utilities. Mr. Fraleigh felt that it <br />was a bad idea. <br />A general discussion ensued regarding the deferment on the utility fees to the certificate of completion and the <br />application fee for the request to the deferment. In response to the Commission question, Ms. Smith stated that the full use <br />of the utilities would not be available to the site until the fees are paid and the certificate of completion is issued. <br />A discussion ensued regarding modifying Section 86.3(a) and lien rights. It was decided to modify Section 86.3(a) <br />to read: <br />Generally. Any applicant may enter into a Fee Deferral Agreement with the City designed to allow the applicant to <br />defer payment of water benefit fees, water connection fees, sewer benefit fees, or sewer connection charges; --uetg <br />such time as the prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. <br />