Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of January 13, 2014 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 12 of 22 <br />9. RESOLUTIONS <br />A. Resolution 14 -2561— Amendment #4 to the General Construction Manager at Risk <br />for Projects Less Than $2 Million Agreement with Wharton - Smith, Inc. for <br />Construction of the Granular Activated Carbon Treatment Addition Project at the <br />South Water Treatment Plant and Related Budget Amendment #14 -012 <br />The City Clerk read Resolution 14 -2561 by title as follows: <br />"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA, <br />APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT #4 TO THE GENERAL <br />CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK FOR PROJECTS LESS THAN $2 MILLION <br />AGREEMENT WITH WHARTON- SMITH, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH WATER <br />TREATMENT PLANT GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT ADDITION; <br />PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE." <br />Staff Presentation: Water Resources Manager Alan Ambler gave a brief overview of the item, explaining <br />that Resolution 14 -2561 and Resolution 14 -2562 were related to the same project to add a large granular <br />activated carbon filter to remove organic material from the South Water Treatment Plant. He added that the <br />water quality issues had been approached in several different phases, including remediation of wells and <br />unidirectional flushing. He stated that they had done pilot studies to see if granular activated carbon would <br />work and that Wharton - Smith, Inc. and Reiss Engineering had partnered together on this type project in several <br />other places, including Seminole County Southwest Regional Treatment Plant and the City of St. Cloud. He <br />stated he was very confident that the project would be successful in improving the water quality at the South <br />Treatment Plant in less than a year. In response to questions from the Commission Mr. Ambler advised that <br />the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) <br />had been following the City's actions in trying to remedy the water quality issues, and if the City did nothing <br />those agencies would issue an order requiring that a solution be implemented or the plant would have to be <br />taken off line until they were resolved. <br />Discussion: A brief discussion ensued regarding the requirement by the EPA and FDEP to remedy the water <br />quality issues; earlier evaluation of other methods for improving the water quality; cost effectiveness of the <br />granular activated carbon method; service life of the filter containers and filters; possibility of pumping water <br />from the North and Howell Park plants to improve the water quality for the utility customers in the south end <br />of the service area; and the fact that the mandate for more strict testing and compliance with EPA's water <br />quality requirements was a nationwide issue that many municipalities and counties were having to address. <br />Audience Participation: The following individuals came forward to address Resolution 14 -2561: <br />1. Mr. James Fraleigh, 23 Teresa Court, spoke in opposition to Resolution 14 -2561, voicing <br />concerns that additional experts in water quality should be consulted and other options <br />investigated that may be more cost effective. He added that he felt the citizens should be <br />informed about the issues and the options for solutions. <br />2. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, expressed concerns about moving forward <br />with the project before obtaining additional information such as aerial photographs from the <br />