Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRI CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of March 11, 2013 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 3 of 19 <br />components rather than having it designed by itself at a later time. He advised that components 1 and 2 are <br />currently funded and they are hoping to wrap up the design phase by September, 2013 and have those under <br />construction by Fall or Winter of 2014. <br />Vice Mayor Solomon stated she was excited about these improvement projects to enhance the City, noting that <br />Seminole County has also approved a plan to redevelop its portion of Oxford Road and has already started their <br />study. Mayor Glancy thanked Dr. Brock for his presentation, and commended him for his vision and foresight <br />in combining the design for all three components. A copy of the Powerpoint presentation is attached to <br />and made a part of these minutes. <br />7. CITIZENS' COMMENTS <br />Mayor Glancy announced persons that wished to make comment or make inquiry on any matter not on the <br />agenda, may request to be recognized during Citizens' Comments. Mayor Glancy announced the rules of <br />decorum. The following individuals carne forward: <br />1. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, commented on Dr. Brock's presentation, <br />suggesting it would also be helpful if the intersection at Kenwick Circle and Oxford Road <br />could be realigned. He added that he preferred the vertical spelling on the sign post for the <br />flyover. <br />2. Mr. Bill Grady, 430 Lowndes Square, requested clarification aboutwhetherthe $250,000 cost <br />listed in Consent Item 8(C) was for design, and also whether the project had gone through a <br />bid process. <br />Mayor Glancy explained that during the citizen's comments portion of the meeting, the Commission generally <br />listened only and did not provide feedback at that time, but would possibly direct staff to address questions and <br />concerns after the meeting. She added that Dr. Brock could speak with Mr. Grady after the meeting and <br />address his questions. <br />Dr. Brock clarified that the City currently had three transportation consultants, and they were using one of the <br />three for this project through a continuing service contract. He added that this was consistent with the <br />Competitive Consultants Negotiations Act, the section of the Florida Statutes which mandates that consultants <br />cannot be bid against one another. <br />3. Mr. James Fraleigh, 23 Teresa Court, spoke in opposition of using an appointment process to <br />select the new Commissioner, stating he felt an election would result in someone who would <br />more fairly represent the citizens. He also expressed concerns about what he believed to have <br />been past violations of his Constitutional right to speak at Commission meetings. <br />4. Mr. Robert Phillips, 251 South Triplet Lake Drive, expressed appreciation for the <br />Commission's decision to follow a process which advertised for and solicited criteria -based <br />applicants for the Commission appointment. He then spoke in support of Mr. Andrew <br />Meadows for the appointment to vacant Commission Seat 2. <br />