My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PZ 05/09/2012 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
>
P & Z Minutes Archives
>
2012 P & Z Minutes
>
PZ 05/09/2012 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2013 3:39:16 PM
Creation date
8/1/2013 1:11:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
5/9/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Commission/ <br />Local Planning Agency <br />May 9, 2012 <br />Page 4 <br />said they have addressed some minor comments and he has a revised architectural elevation that he would like to <br />present to the Commission (a copy is attached and made a part of the minutes). Mr. Gelbert said that the proposed <br />split -faced block system with the false windows presents some construction issues. Mr. Gelbert proposed a full EFIS <br />system (synthetic stucco system) with fixed shutters in lieu of windows. Mr. Gelbert stated that the reduced number <br />of trees in the landscape plan was to provide more visibility to the sign on the front corner of the building. Mr. Wadley <br />felt that adding an additional tree in that area would still provide sufficient visibility for the sign. In response to the <br />Commission's concern regarding the appearance of the right side elevation, Mr. Gelbert felt planting the required <br />landscaping would limit the visibility to that portion of the building. A discussion ensued regarding improving the <br />appearance of a metal building and the type and location of the mechanical equipment. <br />In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Gelbert stated that there is an area in the back of the <br />building that would be used for unloading merchandise. He said that Family Dollar usually receives deliveries once a <br />week for approximately one hour. <br />A discussion ensued regarding the dumpster enclosure and various material options for the dumpster gate. <br />Mr. Gelbert said he was willing to work with the City to dress up the gate. <br />Mr. Meadows asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition <br />to, the request. No one came forward. <br />Mr. Meadows asked for final comments from staff. Mr. Sorensen said staff has some concerns with the <br />longevity and the quality of the synthetic stucco material. He said the block wall (facing Seminola Boulevard) was a <br />better option. He said the requirement for the faux windows is to simulate other development in the area. Mr. <br />Sorensen stated that the Bahama shutters on a block wall would be acceptable in lieu of the faux windows. <br />Mr. Meadows asked for final comments from the applicant. Mr. Gelbert said that EFIS is a standard material <br />that is used on every commercial building. He said the metal building doesn't lend itself to traditional stucco. He said <br />EFIS material has significantly improved over the last 20 - 30 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.