PZ 05/08/2013 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency May 8, 2013 Page 6 Mr. Lefkowitz said that he will continue to do business in Casselberry until his lease expires in December 2013. Mr. Lefkowitz felt that the City's Code is highly discriminatory. He said other businesses in the City are allowed to store items outside and restaurants are allowed outside seating. He said there is something very basically wrong with the way the Commission is approaching cultivating the businesses they want. Sixth Item of Business: LPA 13.02: Solicitor's Permit Ordinance. Amendments to City Code, Chapter 26, Businesses, Article III, Peddlers, Solicitors, Begging and Panhandling. Mr. Jason Sorensen, Planner I, requested that this item be continued until the next meeting as the City Attorney has not completed her review of the ordinance. Mr. Meadows asked for a motion to continue LPA 13 -02, Solicitor's Permit Ordinance. Mr. Wadley made a motion to continue this item. Mr. Guzman seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Seventh Item of Business: LPA 13.04: Impact fee Schedule Ordinance. Amending various Chapters within the City Code to adopt the fees and structure for the recently adopted Impact Fee Study. Ms. Marie Regan, Planner II, requested this item be continued to the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting due to an error in advertising. Mr. Meadows asked for a motion for LPA 13 -04, Impact Fee Schedule Ordinance. Mr. Bryan made a motion to continue this item. Mr. Wadley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Eighth Item of Business: Other Business. Tree Information Mr. Jason Sorensen, Planner I, and Ms. Marie Regan, Planner, II, reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (a copy is attached and made a part of the minutes). A general discussion ensued regarding the following items: 1. Calculations of plant units 2. Mathematic problems in determining tree calculations 3. Clarification regarding nuisance trees size 4. Breakdown of commercial /residential acreage of the City and Planned Communities 5. Options for tree replacement for dead trees on commercial sites • if the site meets the landscaping requirements - no replacement would be required • set a specific amount of dbh for a site rather than by the number of trees on the site — if it exceeds that amount — no replacement would be required • if the site does not meet the landscaping requirements - a tree for tree replacement would be required 6. Caliper versus dbh sizing 7. Residential tree replacement criteria /landscaping requirements 8. Duplex — commercial /residential designation for tree replacement