My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 04/13/2012
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2012 City Commission Minutes
>
CC Minutes 04/13/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 1:13:05 PM
Creation date
3/21/2013 11:57:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Workshop
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
4/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 13, 2012 — Retreat/Worlcshop <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />-Establish an Economic Development Fund <br />-Conclusions <br />-Big Ideas <br />•Identifiable Goals <br />Flexibility to Change as the Market Does <br />-Proactive Efforts to Cultivate Opportunity <br />A copy of the PowerPoint presentation is attached to and made a part of these minutes. <br />Discussion: A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the various economic development strategies brought forth <br />in Mr. Martin's presentation, including possible annexation of the Jai Alai property, partnering with Seminole <br />County for development opportunities, funding opportunities, and possible economic impact of an amateur <br />sports facility. Some concerns were expressed about the possibility of businesses closing due to inaccessibility <br />caused by construction of the flyover. Various ideas were discussed about the need to provide entrances to <br />those businesses that will be affected by the flyover. <br />Additional discussion ensued regarding the establishment of incentives for businesses to locate in the City of <br />Casselberry, including a property tax relief program which is now allowed by the Legislature and could grant a <br />10 -year tax break to businesses that meet certain criteria, and the establishment of an economic development <br />fiend. Mr. Martin advised that the tax relief program has to go to the citizens for a vote, and if the Commission <br />wished to go this direction, the item could be placed on the November ballot. He also explained that the <br />economic development fund would be used to entice businesses by assisting with payment of impact fees and <br />similar items. He added that the City of Oviedo had established an economic development fund, seeded with <br />money from their general find. <br />Mr. Martin concluded by recommending an Economic Development Advisory Board be established which <br />would be comprised of corporate citizens of Casselberry and would meet quarterly to hear a report from staff <br />on development that is occurring, and to discuss ideas and suggestions for other development. He stated that a <br />list of possible appointees to this Board was provided in the meeting packets. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the tax break incentive program, possible appointees to the Economic <br />Development Advisory Board, ways to improve the City's image using various media, and other ideas for <br />presenting the City as a business - friendly community. <br />In response to an inquiry from Mr. Newlon, the Commission agreed by consensus that they would like to see a <br />presentation on the tax relief idea at a future meeting. <br />The Commission meeting recessed at 11:30 a.m. <br />The Commission meeting reconvened at 11:34 a.m. <br />Mr. Newlon introduced Mr. Richard Birdoff, principal of RD Management Company, who addressed the <br />Commission regarding his concerns about the impact the flyover will have on development in the area. Mr. <br />Birdoff utilized visual aids to share with the Commission information about his property holdings in the <br />Casselberry area, and some ideas he has for development of the properties. He expressed his feeling that there <br />are better alternatives for the development of the U.S. 17- 92 /S.R. 436 intersection and surrounding areas than <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.