Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRY CITY CONINIISSION <br />Minutes of rebruary 27, 2012 -Regular Meeting <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />credit against the purchase of a lot in the City Idea Park, but CFE has requested monetary compensation. <br />Budget Impact: This item was not budgeted. Should the settlement agreement be approved, a budget <br />amendment will follow at the next meeting and funds will be drawn from the contingency reserve. <br />Discussion ensued regarding how the final dollar amount for the Settlement Agreement was determined, <br />historical background information, and construction of the ar-iginal Land Swap and Credit Agreement. IVIr. <br />John Samaan, Attorney representing CFE, came forward and clarified the value agreed upon for the Settlement <br />Agreement is just under $4 per square foot, noting the original valuation completed in 2006 was $6 per square <br />foot, which was then negotiated down to $3.96. <br />MOTION: Vice Mayor Ilufford moved to approve Resolution 12-234, as presented. <br />Motion was seconded by Commissioner Solomon. <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Miller voiced concerns regarding the construction ofthe original Land <br />Swap and Credit Agreement, and the negotiated square footage value, stating he <br />might consider a lower settlement amount if the City did not due its due diligence in <br />negotiation and preparation of the original agreement. The City Attorney stated she <br />did not think there was any reason to believe that the original Land Swap and Credit <br />Agreement had any weaknesses that would cause the City any problem in litigation. <br />Ms. Reischmami fiuther stated the reasons the Settlement Agreement has been <br />brought forward for consideration were: 1) it is the City Attorney's responsibility to <br />bring all settlements foltivard to the City Commission; and 2) the City will incur <br />additional attorney's fees in litigation because CFE will file a lawsuit almost <br />immediately since they have waited all these years trying to settle the matter and feel <br />it has claims or causes of action against the City put•suant to the original agreement. <br />Motion carried 4 - 1 by voice vote (Commissioner Miller dissenting). <br />1a T I+J IE S <br />No items were scheduled on this agenda. <br />13. ISCiTSSI® ITEMS <br />A. Future Agenda Items <br />Colmnissioner Solomon addressed the City Code provision requiring if application is made for City utility <br />service to property located outside the City limits that is not contiguous to the existing City limits, the owner of <br />the property must execute an agreement to annex the property into the City when the property becomes <br />contiguous to the City limits. Commissioner Solomon requested that the matter be placed on a fiittue agenda <br />for discussion. The City Attorney stated there was a constraint on discussing the matter due to the pending <br />Meeks litigation. She requested the City Commission conduct an executive session (attorney-client session) <br />