CC Minutes 02/27/2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION Minutes of Tebruaiy 27, 2012 -Regular Meeting Page 8 of 12 Staff Presentation: Mr. Don Martin, Community Development Director, stated Ordinance 12-1371 provides for imposition of a 180-day moratorium on issuance of City permits, approvals and any other official actions related to Internet cafes and similar indoor entertainment and amusement activities within the City limits. The current moratorium expires on March 9, 2012. If approved, Ordinance 12-1371 will provide for a new moratorium to be in place until September 21, 2012. It is anticipated that the State and County's legislation will be resolved by that time. The City Attorney reported on the status of the County related litigation. Budget Impact: This item has no impact to the City Budget. Recommendation: The Interim City Manager and the Community Development Director recommended approval of Ordinance 12-1371 on first reading. MOTION: Commissioner Aramendia moved to approve Ordinance 12-1371 on first reading, as presented. Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Hufford. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote 5 - 0. 11. ESL~JT N~ A. Resolution 12-2348 -Land Swap Settlement Agreement with Central Florida Environmental, Inc. The City Clerk read Resolution 12-2348 by title as follows: "A RI!;SOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA, AUTHORISING THE EXECUTION OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CENTRAL FLORIDA ENVIl20NMENTAL CORPORATION (CFE) AND THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE." Staff Presentation: Ms. Catherine Reischmann, City Attorney, stated Resolution 12-2348 provides for a Land Swap Settlement Agreement between the City of Casselberty and Central Florida Environmental, Inc. (CFE) in the amount of $25,000. In return, CFE releases the City from all liability. On or about June 27, 2005, the City entered into a Land Swap and Credit Agreement in connection with the realigmnent of North Winter Park Drive. Back in 2006, CFE conveyed a parcel to the City which became part of the new road. CFE believes it has claims or causes of action against the City arising from the City's failure to tunely perform its obligations under the agreefent; however the City denies that it materially breached any of its contractual obligations to CFE. The City has previously offered compensation to CFE in accordance with the terms of the agreement, a