PZ 03/10/2010 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commissionl Local Planning Agency March 10, 2010 Page 2 Mr. Aramendia moved to accept the February 24, 2010 minutes with the exclusion of what the Chairman had stated as presented. Mr. Weinroth seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote, Second Item of Business: Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications. No disclosure of Ex Parte Communications was made by the Commissioners. Third Item of Business: CU 10-01:225 Lake Ellen DrivelA. Colon. Conditional use request for a dock. Mr. Charles Senzee, Planner, reviewed the information provided in his memorandum dated March 5, 2010 supported by a PowerPoint presentation to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission (copies are on file in the Community Development Department). Mr. Senzee stated Staff finds that the design of the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. He said if the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to approve CU 10-01 to allow a private residential dock at 225 Lake Ellen Drive, the motion would be based on the staff report dated March 4, 2010, the site drawing attached as Exhibit B in the staff report, the dock design attached as Exhibit D in the staff report, the Planning and Zoning Commission's findings of fact, and the conditions outlined in the staff report which were: 1. The conditional use shall be limited to the existing dock structure. The dock shall not be enlarged or enhanced in any way without additional conditional use approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. The construction and maintenance of the dock shall be in accordance with the requirements of all applicable state agencies and the City's ULDR. 3. A building permit for the dock shall be obtained within 60 days of the approval and a final inspection shall be obtained within 120 days of the issuance of the building permit. 4. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed or the conditional use shall become null and void. A general discussion ensued regarding lighting requirements for docks, the existence of other floating docks on the lake, installation of the dock, a survey for existing docks on the various lakes to determine if docks were permitted, and penalties for unpermitted work. Mr. Parkhurst asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Senzee stated that the applicant was not present at the meeting. Mr. Parkhurst asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. No one came forward.