PZ 02/24/2010 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning CommissloN Local Planning Agency February 2k, 2010 Page 9 Mr. Patrick Knight, 1785 Stale Road 436, Winter Park, Florida came forward. Mr. Knight expressed a concern regarding rebuilding his property if it were damaged. He said that he has a unique situation that he has some manufacturing and he would not be able to rebuild or expand his site. He said that it limits his ability as to what he can do on his property in the future. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Casselberry said he didn't know if there was a legal definition for the land use plan changes but in development fhis would be considered a huge land use change of regional impact and it would require review by Tallahassee, He recommended chat this item should be sent back for staff to review. He was concerned that the agenda was not posted on the City's website. He also expressed concerns with the setback requirements needed for the taller buildings. He said he spoke with the County Commissioners legal department regarding the taxation and same other departments that were headed by constitutional officers and the County Commission does not have any influence over those employees. He said based on attending City meetings, he felt that the City is concerned that the County is undervaluing praperties. He felt that this could give the County power Eo overvalue properties and still cripple the City. Ms. Lynell Mulcahy, 120 Lemon Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Ms, Mulcahy questioned the designation for the area behind lots 10 and 11 near the church on Skate Road 436. Ms, Smith stated that area has a low density residential designation. She said the property owners in that area were not notified because that area was not included in the proposed future land use change. Mr. James Fraleigh, 1290 Seminole Boulevard, Casselberry, Florida came forward, Mr. Fraleigh felt that it was a bad decision to make these proposed changes, Mr. Fraleigh expressed a concern with the restriction to rebuild a property if it is damaged more than 50%. Mr. Fraleigh commented thak the City Commission would review requests to rebuild damaged properties. He said it is wrong to make changes that will hinder the future use of a person`s property. Mr. Fraleigh was concerned that the Gity will not attract new businesses to Casselberry which will affect the City's tax base.