BOA Minutes 10/26/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment October 26, 2006 Page 2 Mr. said the variance application meets three of the six criteria for granting the variance. He said City staff supports the request based upon the benefits provided to the property owners in question. Mr. said if the Board of Adjustment chooses to grant the variance requested for BA 06-14, for the property located at to an 8 tall building line a should upon the Board of Adjustment's findings of fact and conclusions, the property survey (Exhibit B) dated November 10, 1999, the outlined in the report which were: 1. 2. shall meet all other 3. No additional 8 foot tall fencing will be permitted on this property without further variance approval from the Board of Adjustment. 4. A building permit for the fence shall obtained from the Building the of Adjustment and a final inspection shall approved within 120 5. All fees with this variance must paid in full within 30 meeting. 6. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed or the variance shall become null and void. to 8 as in B. ofthe approval by of the building permit. of the of Adjustment Mr. asked the applicant to come forward for any rebuttal to the City's presentation. Mr. Tim Fitzpatrick, North Winter Park Drive, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Fitzpatrick said is the neighbor to the south of the DePew's residence and he is responsible for the construction of the fence. Mr. Fitzpatrick said during the construction work on his property the DePew's was damaged and he offered to the He said due to the elevation of the pool deck he installing an 8 foot fence to provide additional privacy for both parties and also to minimize the noise generated in the pool area. Mr. Fitzpatrick said he was not aware a permit was needed to replace an existing fence. After a brief discussion regarding the permitting and inspection process, Mr. BiIlerbeck asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of the request. No one came forward. Mr. Billerbeck noted for the record that there was a letter received from the resident at 35 North Winter Park Drive speaking in favor of the variance request. Mr. clarified that the property received a violation notice and no fines were He said the fence height is not a normal part of the building inspection. Mr. Billerbeck asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in opposition to the request. No one came forward. There were no general citizen's comments regarding the variance.