CC Minutes 03/26/2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION March 26, 2007 - Regular Meeting Page 5 of 15 G. Letter to Seminole County Legislative Delegation Approval is requested to send a joint letter from the Casselberry City Commission expressing concerns regarding property tax reform proposals and their projected effects(s) on the City of Casselberry. MOTION: Vice Mayor Doerner moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Hufford. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote 5 - O. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 06-1194 _ REVISION TO ULDR SECTION 3-10.9. PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Notice of Public Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing relevant to Ordinance 06-1194 was published in the Orlando Sentinel on March 15, 2007. Staff Presentation and Recommendation: Ms. Barbara Lipscomb, City Manager stated further review of Ordinance 06-1194 is necessary and it is requested that this item be continued to April 23, 2007. It was noted that depending on the recommended changes, it may be necessary for the ordinance to come back as a first reading again, but more than likely will not have to go back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for additional review. Since the public hearing was previously advertised, input from the public will still be taken. Audience Participation: The following individuals came forward to address Ordinance 06-1194: I) John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, voiced concerns about whetherornot employers are forcing employees to take company vehicles home and suggested code enforcement officials make inquiries to find out ifthis is the case. Mr. Casselberry also suggested language be incorporated into the ordinance that says no employer can require a citizen to store a company within the city limits. 2) Craig Tull, 420 Ranch Trail, stated he had previously requested any research data and impact studies that has been done to see how the proposed new regulations will impact residents, and to date he has only received a letter from staff stating there were no such studies or data available. Mr. Tull voiced concerns regarding how the City intends to move forward with the proposed new regulations with no impact study, research or subsequent data to back it up. 3) Cal Fisher, 1533 Canterbury Circle, stated the matter has already been postponed for too long, and urged the City Commission to take action on all three parts of the proposed new parking regulations as soon as possible.