Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION 25-3493 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING A GOVERNMENT SIGN <br />USE POLICY AND PROVIDING FOR SIGN SPECIFICATIONS; <br />PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. <br />WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Casselberry plans to replace various City <br />signs on City property with new signs which will include important up-to-date public service <br />announcements through the inclusion of an electronic message center; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it has a duty to communicate with the public about <br />the administrative, legislative and other public business related to the government functions of the <br />City of Casselberry; and <br />WHEREAS, the purpose of the electronic message center feature is to permit the City to <br />use advances in technology to communicate more effectively with the public through the electronic <br />display of a variety of public service announcements selected and controlled by the City in <br />accordance with the use policy established by this Resolution; and <br />WHEREAS, the City will pay for and erect the modifications to the signs without <br />contribution from any public or private entity, and the City will assume full responsibility for <br />providing maintenance and security for the signs; and <br />WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that the government can <br />speak for itself and is entitled to select the views it wants to express and that permanent monuments <br />and signs can represent government speech. See, e.g. Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of <br />Confederate Veterans, 115 S.Ct. 2239 (2015)(Texas could deny a specialty license plate to the <br />Sons of the Confederate Veterans without violating the First Amendment); City of Pleasant <br />Grove v. Summun, 129 S.Ct. 1125 (2009) (Placement of a permanent monument in a public park <br />viewed as government speech and not subject to First Amendment scrutiny); Wells v. City and <br />County of Denver, 257 F. 3d 1132 (10"' Cir. 2001) (City acted within its rights to control the <br />contents of its own speech by prohibiting private holiday display on steps of city building); and <br />WHEREAS, the City will exercise complete supervision and control of sign content, which <br />will be limited to notices of public health concerns or emergencies, such as "boil water alerts" and, <br />if space allows, notices of city -sponsored events of general public interest in accordance with <br />policies set forth by the City Manager; and <br />WHEREAS, the City of Casselberry government signs cannot be used by any private <br />business or to promote any businesses or private events; and <br />WHEREAS, a City is entitled to value public service speech over other kinds of speech; <br />and <br />