My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 06/26/2006
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2006 City Commission Minutes
>
CC Minutes 06/26/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2006 2:28:02 PM
Creation date
10/20/2006 2:28:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
6/26/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Commission Meeting <br />June 26, 2006 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />pay the penalties for their proportionate share of the underfunded portion to the Trust Fund. The <br />estimated amount of penalties for the underfunded periods is $160,998 for the City and $28,858 for <br />the County. <br /> <br />. Mr. Kohler stated in summary, while there have been a number of errors committed in adhering to <br />the calculations and delivery of the appropriate revenues to the CRA Trust Fund, there appear to be <br />reasonable options to restore compliance. These would include making up the underfunded <br />differential, not discounting the land swap/loan forgiveness, paying the interest on the underfunded <br />amount and having the CRA Trust Fund reimburse the City for the eligible expenses. The interest <br />payments owed by the County and the City could possibly be modified or forgiven if both the City <br />and the County agree. The two additional annexed parcels need their own course of attention to be <br />properly included in a modified plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Kohler suggested there be an Interlocal Agreement between the City and the CRA, drafted and <br />approved annually related to administrative overhead costs and other reimbursable costs to be paid <br />by the CRA. This should be established by the CRA and approved by the City Commission during <br />budget adoption schedule. <br /> <br />. Mr. Kohler recommended that an annual invoice be submitted by the CRA to the City and County <br />in November of each year delineating the dollar amount each entity is required to fund the Trust <br />Fund by January 1" of the upcoming year. <br /> <br />Mr. Kohler also recommended establishment of CRA policies and procedures regarding the <br />implementation process. <br /> <br />Audience InDut: Mr. Paul Daigle, Chairman of the Casselberry CRA, Business Address, 213 Live Oaks <br />Boulevard, residing at 525 South Triplet Lake Drive, Casselberry, Florida, stated that the CRA was <br />addressing the situation regarding the discrepancies in the CRA funding and were anxious to resolve and <br />prevent such discrepancies from reoccurring and move forward with more successful projects within the <br />CRA. Mr. Daigle also indicated that they would be inviting Mr. Kohler to come and address the CRA for <br />his suggestions to help resolve the matter. <br /> <br />The Interim City manager presented to the Commission a request from the Seminole County Clerk's Office <br />to do an audit regarding funding for the CRA Trust Fund. Mr. Kohler suggested that the appropriate <br />position for the City may be to allow him and the staff to meet with the County Clerk and go over the <br />numbers and discuss his findings to determine if there are any differences without having to do a specific <br />audit. <br /> <br />Mayor Goff stated that the County Clerk is acting under the direction of the Seminole County <br />Commission/CRA to conduct the audit ofthe Casselberry CRA Trust Fund. He stated that he was hesitant <br />to allow the Clerk to invade the sovereignty of the City of Casselberry on the request of a third party. He <br />strongly recommended the Commission allow the Clerk to do the audit and not delay or put any roadblock <br />in front of the County Commission's request for an independent audit of the books to avoid the risk of <br />losing the County participation in the CRA or losing the CRA in its entirety. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.