My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-1645 NOT ADOPTED
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Resolutions
>
Resolutions Archives
>
2006 Resolutions
>
06-1645 NOT ADOPTED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2006 3:30:42 PM
Creation date
3/10/2006 3:27:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Doc Type
Resolutions
City Clerk - Date
1/23/2006
Doc Number
06-1645
Sticky Note
ID:
1
Text:
Resolution 06-1645 was not adopted. Please see the January 23, 2006 City Commission Minutes for more information.
DGG
Stamp
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
8/22/2012 10:09 AM
Modified:
8/22/2012 10:09 AM
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />is approved, the Board shall then vote on the original motion that was the subject <br />of debate. <br /> <br />APPEAL OF A PROCEDURAL DECISION OF THE MAYOR <br /> <br />I. Purpose is to disagree with a procedural ruling of the Mayor and allow the <br />Commission to decide the disagreement by taking a vote. <br />2. The motion to appeal requires a second, and must be made at the time the ruling <br />was made by the Mayor. <br />3. The motion is debatable by the Commission. <br />4. The question to be decided is whether to sustain the mayor's ruling. A majority or <br />tie vote sustains the decision of the Mayor. <br /> <br />MAYOR'S (AS PRESIDING OFFICER) ROLE DURING DEBATE <br /> <br />I. The Mayor has the responsibility of keeping the discussion on point with the <br />subject being considered remaining mindful of time afforded the discussion. <br />2. The Mayor shall maintain order during the discussion assuring that each member <br />of the Commission is allotted appropriate opportunity for input and rebuttal and <br />that interruption of the speakers does not occur. <br />3. At the appropriate time after the debate concludes, the Mayor may attempt to <br />summarize the motion before the Board and seek clarification from <br />Commissioners if any issues related to the discussion remain in doubt. <br />4. When it appears that all Commissioners that wish to speak have done so, the <br />Mayor may inquire if there is a desire for further discussion. If so, the discussion <br />may continue. If not, the question is put to a vote. <br /> <br />METHODS OF VOTING <br /> <br />I. Voice vote (commissioners respond with a yes vote to a request from the mayor as <br />to those in favor of a particular motion under consideration.) <br />2. Roll Call (when required or requested, the city clerk will call the roll of <br />commissioners present seeking a yes or no response to the motion under <br />consideration. ) <br />3. ALL votes are binding during a meeting, unless the issue is offered for <br />reconsideration by a Commissioner voting with the majority on a motion <br />previously voted upon at the same meeting or the next meeting of the Commission. <br />4. The Citv Clerk will commence roll call with the Commissioner to his immediate <br />ri!!ht and for each succeeding: auestion. commence the roll call with the next <br />Commissioner to his ri!!ht until all members of the Commission have been called <br />first. The Citv Clerk will call UDon the Mavor in the normal voting: seauence. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.