Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,._,,:¡j'hl <br />;;.,;,"-:.~~;l. 7'))' , <br />~~""'f ,,;I'. <br />:/:::::1';'" \ .~~¡(;. <br />~~r'" _,,'-' I> ,;..J.." <br />~ -'~ ,::,.;~'> ~ -~ <br />~t If. ~ ~' j :': <br />'f '\ ...... '..'"", ,~ <br />\, ,.~~.~,.,~~.":"'< j <br />,{<¡pre \. _'" <br />\'~~Y..:$..$~'" <br /> <br />City of Casselberry <br />Chief Planner <br /> <br />95 Triplet Lake Drive, Casselberry, Florida 32707 . Telephone (407) 262-7700, Ex!. 1108 <br />Fax (407) 262-7763 . Email: ssmith@casselberry.org <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Richard W. Wells, AICP, Community Development Director <br /> <br />Sandra J. Smith, AICP, Chief Plannerff <br /> <br />January 13, 2005 <br /> <br />Ordinance No. 04-1151: Unified Land Development Code (ULDR) revision to Section 3-10.9, <br />Parking of vehicles in residential districts. (LPA 04-13) <br /> <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Ordinance No. 04-1151 was approved on first reading and first public hearing at the November 22, 2004 City <br />Commission meeting (Exhibit A: Original packet). This ordinance addresses only the specific issue of commercial <br />signage within Subsection A, General Requirements. During the meeting, the City Commission requested additional <br />information from staff (Exhibit B: Minutes) regarding other issues. <br /> <br />Staff research and discussions revealed that code language had been omitted and that other portions of this <br />particular code section were unclear or in need of updating. Therefore, the information provided in this report takes a <br />holistic view of the entire text within ULDR Section 3-10.9 and provides options for change. The City Commission <br />may want to adopt portions of the proposed revisions at this time or defer to a latter date. The draft revision (Exhibit <br />C) correlates to the data within this report. The blue text is either underlined as an addition or has a stFiIĊ’ tI:u:e~¡¡R for <br />deletion. A letter is provided in a box in the margin. This letter relates back to the data within this report that <br />addresses that particular issue. <br /> <br />A. Code Enforcement Activity: <br />"During a twelve month period in 2003 - 2004, 209 instances of commercial vehicle parking in a residential <br />area were noted by the Code Enforcement Division. City staff initiated 164 of these actions, which includes the Police <br />Department, and 45 were from citizen complaints. Of the 209 instances, only 6 citations were issued to individuals. At <br />this time, all of the active and inactive "cases" have complied with the city code. Currently, we have received from the <br />Police Department 13 additional reports of possible commercial vehicles parking in residential areas. These will be <br />monitored for compliance." (Jimette Cook, Code Enforcement Bureau) <br /> <br />Considering that there are approximately 8,000 residences in the City of Casselberry, the 209 instances <br />equate to 2.6 percent of the residential units in the City being notified of a violation of the Commercial Vehicle <br />ordinance. During 2004, Code Enforcement logged in 2744 complaints. Commercial vehicle complaints are <br />approximately 7.4% of the enforcement effort. <br /> <br />PhotoaraDhs: Exhibit D is a pictorial display of various types of commercial vehicles found both inside and <br />outside of the City limits. The photos are grouped based on the type of vehicle. <br /> <br />Jurisdictional information: Exhibit E provides a comparison of various jurisdictional requirements. Based on <br />the currently proposed code changes, Casselberry's code will equate to Oviedo, Sanford and Seminole County's <br />requirements. Oviedo tolerates a larger vehicle, Sanford has a lower size threshold than Casselberry, and Seminole <br />County does not have any regulations regarding commercial vehicles. <br />