My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 11/15/2004
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2004 City Commission Minutes
>
CC Minutes 11/15/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2005 2:54:50 PM
Creation date
1/12/2005 11:28:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Workshop
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
11/15/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of November 15, 2004 R Work Session <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />3. ACTION TO READ ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS <br /> <br />Suggestion: A single motion to approve and read by title only any ordinance or resolution presented to the <br />Board with an appropriate second could expedite Board discussion/action. <br /> <br />Reason: Now, a separate motion/second to read an ordinance or resolution is voted upon. Then the Board <br />discusses the issue. After discussion, a motion to approve with second is then voted upon. Usually, meeting <br />procedures/guidelines require a motion to be on the floor (moved for adoption) prior to it being discussed. <br /> <br />Commission Discussion/Consensus: Commission consensus was to continue to read Ordinances and <br />Resolutions by title only without requiring a motion to do so. The Mayor will direct the City Clerk to read <br />each title. <br /> <br />4. COMMITTEE/BOARD APPOINTMENT POLICIES <br /> <br />Issue: How appointments are made and voted upon. <br /> <br />Curreut Practice: Nominations are presented to the full Board and voted upon. Nominees receiving a <br />majority vote are duly appointed. <br /> <br />Option: Mayor Goff has proposed to establish the individual right of each City Commissioner to nominate <br />an appointee to each of the various volunteer boards. Those appointments would then be ratified by the <br />entire Commission. <br /> <br />Commission Discussion/Consensus: Commission consensus was to continue the current appointment <br />policies and establishing initial and continual training for Board Members to ensure that they are consistent <br />in how they apply their authority. Staff was directed to work on finding ways to expand the pool of qualified <br />applicants and achieving a better geographical mix of residents on each board. Staff will also further <br />research possible background checks and refinement of the application form to possibly help delineate <br />qualifications of the applicant for each Board appointment requested. <br /> <br />5. OTHER PROCEDUREIPOLICY ISSUES <br /> <br />Commission Discussion/Consensus: Commission consensus was to direct staff to develop a request card <br />for audience members to fill out at meetings and request to address agenda items or any other matter, <br />eliminating the current practice requiring audience members to request to speak to an item during Audience <br />Participation. The request cards can be turned in to the City Clerk any time prior to the matter being <br />considered. The request cards will suggest that participants try to limit their input to five minutes and <br />provide information as to the City Commission's new meeting procedures. The Code requirement of <br />approval of the agenda by the Mayor prior to distribution, and general meeting decorum issues including <br />individual Commissioner rights to ask questions directly to Charter Officers during meetings were discussed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.