Laserfiche WebLink
City Commission Meeting <br />May 12, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />PRESENTATION <br /> <br />Mr. Luis Diaz, P.E. with the firm of Post Buckley Schuh & Jemigan (PBS&J) and Deputy <br />Project Manager for the State Road 436 and 17-92 intersection improvements presented options <br />in a slide presentation outlining the project schedule, preliminary design and engineering <br />(PD&E) study process for the intersection of S.R. 436 and U.S. 17-92. <br /> <br />Alternative 9, Viaduct alignment for U.S. 17-92 over S.R. 436 appeared to be the number one <br />choice of the Commission. Mr. Diaz indicated that the viaduct alternative would be the most <br />costly. <br /> <br />Mr. Diaz stated that public hearings regarding the intersection improvements were scheduled for <br />May and August. 2003. The final recommendations for the preliminary design and engineering <br />study for the intersection improvements should be completed by October 2003. <br /> <br />A copy of the slide presentation is attached to and made a part of these minutes. <br /> <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br /> <br />Mayor Pronovost asked if there was anyone in the audience that wished to request participation <br />on any agenda item. The following individual came forward: <br /> <br />1. Mr. David Henson, 233 Bridle Path, Casselberry, FL - Items 7 and 8 <br />2. Mr. John Eckbert, 1414 Grove Terrace, Winter Park, FL - Item #7 <br />3. Mr. Parks Wilson, 520 Lake Cham~ Court, Oviedo, FL - Item #4 <br />4. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, FL - Items 7 and 8 <br /> <br />Mayor Pronovost asked if there was anyone in the audience that wished to address the <br />Commission on any item not on the Agenda. The following individual came forward: <br /> <br /> Mr. Dean Myers, 517 Wilshire Drive, Casselberry, FL addressed the reclaimed water <br />project. He indicated that he had not been notified of the $25 fee for installation of the meter for <br />reclaimed water when the project was initiated. He stated that he has since been notified that the <br />fee for the meter would be $200 but the project had been placed on hold due to budget <br />constraints. He asked for consideration of a lower fee. The City Manager was asked to research <br />the situation and report back to the Commission. <br /> <br /> <br />