Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Commission/ <br />Local Planning Agency Minutes <br />February 12, 2025 <br />Page 8 <br />Second, the amendment would update Section 3-16.3 to permit electronic signs as a valid sign type <br />within the City's code. Third, the ordinance proposes modifying Section 3-16.6 (currently <br />Reserved) to include performance standards for EMCs, such as which zoning districts they may <br />be permitted in (CG, CS, PMX-H, PMX-HIGH, PMX-MID, I, I -M, ROS, and PS), as well as <br />requirements for acceptable colors, materials, and size/dimensions. Lastly, the ordinance seeks to <br />amend Section 3-16.8 to remove Electronic Signs from the list of prohibited sign types. <br />Mr. McFerrin noted that the public notice requirements for this amendment were met, with an <br />advertisement published in the Orlando Sentinel on January 31, 2025. <br />In evaluating the proposal for consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Mr. McFerrin <br />highlighted several relevant policies. Most notably, Policy FLU 7.5 encourages the City to review <br />and update architectural standards to maintain a modern appearance, which includes considering <br />the use of electronic signs that have become more common in Central Florida. Policy 11 <br />emphasizes the importance of protecting residential areas from the encroachment of nonresidential <br />land uses. <br />However, Mr. McFerrin clarified that any installation of EMCs will be subject to site plan review, <br />ensuring that this concern is addressed. Additionally, Policy RO 2.1 supports improvements to <br />parks and recreation facilities, which may eventually serve as spaces for EMCs. Finally, Mr. <br />McFerrin noted that the proposal aligns with Objective 1 of the Comprehensive Plan, which <br />recognizes private property rights by enhancing commercial property use through additional <br />advertising options. <br />Regarding Criteria 2, Conformance with Ordinances, Mr. McFerrin assured that no EMC <br />installations would occur without the necessary site plan review and building permits. Public <br />noticing requirements were also met in preparation for the hearing. <br />For Criteria 3, which relates to changed conditions prompting the request, Mr. McFerrin noted that <br />the request came as a result of a City Commission directive for staff to explore options for <br />including EMCs in the City's Code. Following this directive, workshops were held in May and <br />August of 2024 to discuss potential regulations and performance standards, reflecting <br />collaboration between the City Commission, staff, and the City Attorney's office. <br />Regarding land use compatibility, Mr. McFerrin stated that EMCs would generally be compatible <br />with areas where traditional signage is already permitted, such as CG, CS, and PMX zoning <br />districts. He also noted that the amendment would not negatively affect public service availability <br />and is not expected to have adverse environmental or economic impacts. <br />Mr. McFerrin emphasized that any future EMC installations would be regulated through the Site <br />Plan Review process, applicable overlay district standards, and various performance criteria <br />