My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04/08/2024 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2024 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 04/08/2024 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 8:46:17 AM
Creation date
4/23/2024 8:46:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
4/8/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CiTY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 8, 2024 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 7 of II <br />MOTION: Vice Mayor Aramendia moved to approve Resolution 24-3410, as presented. <br />Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Busch. Motion carried unanimously by <br />voice vote 5-0. <br />10. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES <br />A. First Reading of Ordinance 24-1599 — Amending, Repealing, and Replacing Various <br />Sections of City Code Relating to Noise and Nuisance Abatement <br />The City Clerk read Ordinance 24-1599 by title, as follows: <br />"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO NOISE <br />CONTROL; REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTION 58-56, "UNNECESSARY OR <br />DISTURBING NOISE" WITHIN ARTICLE III, "OFFENSES, AGAINST PUBLIC PEACE" OF <br />CHAPTER 58, "OFFENSES, PUBLIC NUISANCES, AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS" TO <br />UPDATE BASED ON RECENT CASE LAW; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 2-210, <br />"SCHEDULE OF VIOLATIONS" WITHIN ARTICLE V, "CODE ENFORCEMENT <br />CITATIONS" OF CHAPTER 2, "ADMINISTRATION" OF PART II OF THE CODE OF <br />ORDINANCES; AND BY REPEALING AND REPLACING PARAGRAPH G., "NOISE," OF <br />SECTION 3-17.4, "SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT" WITHIN <br />ARTICLE XVII, "NUISANCE ABATEMENT" OF CHAPTER III, "PERFORMANCE <br />CRITERIA" OF PART III, UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY <br />OF CASSELBERRY CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, <br />CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE." <br />Staff Presentation: Chief Planner Antonia DeJesus stated that Ordinance 24-1599 amends, repeals, and <br />replaces various sections of the City's Code of Ordinances and Unified Land Development Regulations <br />(ULDR) relating to noise and nuisance abatement. The City has regulations in place to control excessively <br />loud and unusual noises that can negatively impact surrounding areas. However, the current Code needs to <br />be updated to reflect the latest case law that provides additional guidance related to noise codes. The <br />proposed amendment aims to further secure and promote the public health, comfort, welfare, and prosperity <br />of the City and its residents. The proposed amendment makes three changes which repeal and replace City <br />Code Section 58-56, "Unnecessary or Disturbing Noise," to update the Code based on recent case law; <br />amend City Code Section 2-210, "Schedule of Violations,'; and repeal and replace Paragraph G., "Noise," <br />of ULDR (Unified Land Development Regulations) Section 3-17.4, "Specific Standards for Nuisance <br />Abatement." The proposed amendment provides updated definitions and considers exemptions, in addition <br />to the addition of "Noise Control" to the schedule of violations in City Code Section 2-210 which is <br />considered a Class I1 violation for which the fine is $100 for each day the violation continues. As part of <br />her presentation, Ms. DeJesus also gave an overview of how sound is measured, weighted and perceived. <br />She advised that the proposed amendments are consistent with noise regulations in surrounding sister cities <br />and Seminole County. City Attorney Katie Reischmann pointed out that this is an area that is constantly in <br />flux and is subject to First Amendment challenges, so it was possible that it would be necessary to amend <br />some terms at some point, based on case law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.