My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09/12/2016 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2016 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 09/12/2016 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2023 4:00:09 PM
Creation date
5/30/2023 3:59:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
9/12/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of September 12, 2016— Regular Meeting <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />At Commissioner Meadows' request, Mr. Pieski presented a copy of the permit to City Clerk Donna Gardner <br />who passed it to the Commissioners for their review. Commissioner Meadows noted that what was presented <br />was an application for a permit, but not the actual permit and Mr. Pieski advised that is what he had received <br />from the City. At Mr. Woodruff s request, Dr. Kelly Brock, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer <br />addressed the Commission and clarified that an engineering permit had initially been issued, but the work that <br />had been done was not at all the work which had been permitted. He also noted that the work encroached onto <br />HOA property which another issue altogether, as the City could not have authorized that. He stated that the <br />main violation was the amount of fill dirt that had been brought in, which caused a flood plain violation. He <br />advised that there were actually two permits needed, an engineering permit and a building permit and the <br />retaining wall could not have been built with just the engineering permit. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Solomon moved to reduce the lien in Case #CE -07-02311 (945 <br />Brydie Court) from $66,900 to $2,500 to be paid within sixty (60) days or the <br />lien amount will revert back to the original amount. Motion was seconded by <br />Commissioner Meadows. <br />Discussion: A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the request for reduction, including the length of time <br />since the initial violation; the information brought forward by the property owner and City staff; the character <br />witness' testimony; the reduction amount recommended by the Magistrate; each ofthe Commissioners' feeling <br />on what would be an appropriate amount for the reduction; conflicting information as to whether there was an <br />actual violation and when and if a permit was issued prior to that date; whether non-acceptance of the <br />Magistrate's recommendation would set a precedent for future requests; and whether the matter should be <br />continued in order to review additional information. <br />Motion failed by voice vote 2-3, Mayor Glancy, Vice Mayor Aramendia and <br />Commissioner Hufford dissenting. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Hufford moved to reduce the lien in Case #CE -07-02311 (945 <br />Brydie Court) from $66,900 to $6,690 plus $950 in administrative costs, for a <br />total of $7,640, as recommended by the Code Enforcement Special Magistrate, <br />to be paid within sixty (60) days or the lien amount will revert back to the <br />original amount. Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Aramendia. Motion <br />carried by voice vote 3-2, Commissioners Solomon and Meadows dissenting. <br />13. CITIZENS' COMMENTS <br />Mayor Glancy announced persons that wished to make comment or make inquiry on any matter not on the <br />agenda, may request to be recognized during Citizens' Comments. Mayor Glancy announced the rules of <br />decorum. The following individual came forward: <br />Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, expressed concerns about the oak trees <br />which were marked to be taken down in Lake Concord Park due to being diseased, stating he <br />felt the City should get more opinions on whether removal would actually be necessary. <br />No one else came forward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.