My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 08/27/2012
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2012 City Commission Minutes
>
CC Minutes 08/27/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2022 11:58:02 AM
Creation date
5/19/2022 11:57:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
8/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of August 27, 2012 — Regular Meeting <br />Page 16 of 20 <br />Staff has learned: <br />• First, that the Casselberry Golf Club has not been making money and the owners must infuse <br />additional money to maintain solvency. It is not on a sustainable course and the owners have <br />suggested that they would rather close the course than continue to fund losses. The losing trend <br />affects the golf industry in total as documented in the Orlando Sentinel and other media. There are <br />too many golf courses and too few golfers. <br />• Staff has learned that should the golf course close it could deteriorate into a wide open brush area, and <br />without additional investment would add little natural beauty. Winter Springs Golf Club is an <br />example. <br />• We've learned that the golf course owners would like to sell some measure of developable land to a <br />home builder and convey the remainder to the City to be kept as green space. <br />• We've learned that cities which acquired golf courses in Florida in the last ten years have bought them <br />in order to pursue limited development or to operate them as public courses to be run by contracted <br />managers with the expectation that the operation would make money or break even based on a <br />feasibility study conducted first. <br />• We've learned that profitable golf courses have successful club houses with thriving food, beverage <br />and merchandise sales. Casselberry Golf Club does not have a successful club house. Staff expects to <br />learn without the benefit of a feasibility study that the golf course could not be acquired by the City <br />and run without continued operating deficits. Even a sizable additional investment in renovations <br />would not assure the enterprise would be self sustaining. <br />• We have learned that The Casselberry Golf Club is subject to a Declaration of Restrictions containing <br />a "reverter clause". It was executed on November 23, 1973 and has a fifty-year life expiring in 2023. <br />It is recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County. It states that "During the term of these <br />restrictions ... Owner ... may cease to operate said real property as a golf course at such time as said <br />operation shall become economically unfeasible ... Owner shall convey the real property, free of <br />charge ... unto the City of Casselberry ... and the City of Casselberry shall maintain the ... property <br />as a golf course or greenbelt area." <br />We've learned that the value of real property is based on the development potential. A golf course <br />that has no potential to make money may have no value. Property with the potential to become single <br />family, residential homes may have a lot of value in the millions of dollars. Should the City seek to <br />purchase the land for development, a high price may apply. <br />To raise funds for any kind of golf course purchase it would likely require the approval of a bond <br />referendum by the citizens of Casselberry in an open election. Taxes would have to be increased to <br />pay for the bond issue. <br />Staff recognizes that in order to advance planning it should be done in an open manner with the input of our <br />citizens. Planning should be done based on guiding principles developed to protect the interests of the <br />community, enhance existing property values and maximize the potential for alternative amenities to be paid <br />for by the developer. Successful planning will be better achieved with friendly rather than adversarial <br />development partners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.