CE 05/20/2021 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

hearing date of June 17, 2021 to determine compliance. The Special Magistrate asked if there was anyone wishing to speak to this case, there was no one present. The Special Magistrate made a finding that CE -20-002527, located at 1331 Avalon Blvd., was in violation of the City Code Section as listed on the notice of code violation, based on testimony and evidence provided by the Code Enforcement Officer. It was ordered that the respondent shall cure the violation by 1:00 P.M. June 1, 2021. If there is no compliance by June 1, 2021, then a fine of $250.00 per day will be imposed for each day the property remains in non-compliance. A subsequent hearing will be held on June 17,2021 to determine if compliance has been achieved. SUBSEQUENT CASE — NOT IN COMPLIANCE CE -20-002211 460 Lowndes SQ. Officer McDonald advised the property was partially brought into compliance and was to be completed in stages. The fence permit had yet to be obtained and the respondent was having trouble getting materials. Chris Kangas, property owner, 460 Lowndes Sq. advised that there was an active permit, but he did not have a survey he did have an aerial photo. Mr. McDonald advised that there have been some exceptions and the aerial may work because this is not a new fence. The Special Magistrate discussed the matter and tabled to a subsequent hearing CE -21-000060 1531 E Altamonte Dr. Officer McDonald advised the property was not in compliance by the date previously set Walter Judge, property owner advised that when the property was purchased from Entenmann's Bakery, an agreement was worked out with the City of Casselberry because the City needed and easement to get City sewer on the adjacent property. The Special Magistrate advised that the property has already been found in violation, there are two violations found. The hearing was to decide if the violations have been cured or not cured and officer McDonald stated no permit had been pulled. Mr. Judge stated he cannot pull a permit on work that was already permitted. The Special Magistrate stated it is not a defense to say you do not have to pull a permit. A break was taken to locate documents for the respondent. Supervisor Campbell advised that there was an agreement done and awarded the property owner funds to allow for the City to install a lift station on the property. Mr. Campbell believes it was then a connection was run to the building in question. The building sat vacant for a while and now there is a gym, the permit was for retrofitting the restroom and not connected with the past plumbing matter. The special Magistrate stated the original sewer installation was not an issue, it is whatever work was done in the building. Mr. Judge advised that he would obtain a plumbing permit if required by the Building Official. The original permit was submitted in March and did now get a response until April 27, 2021. Discussion continued. The Special Magistrate discussed the matter and tabled to a subsequent hearing