PZ 08/11/2021 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency Minutes August 11, 2021 Page 2 Fifth Item of Business: SPR 21-07: Grayson Square at 3110 Howell Branch Road Suite 100. A development of community impact site plan request for a 138 -unit townhome development, as well as associated hardscape, landscaping, and stormwater retention. Mr. Jonathan Tardif, Planner I, reviewed the information provided in his memorandum dated August 11, 2021 to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Tardif said staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of case number SPR 21-07 to the City Commission, based on the staff report and the testimony and evidence presented, that the request meets the applicable provisions of the Unified Land Development Regulations and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as per the written findings in the staff report. He said the conditions of approval are as follows: 1. The site plan approval shall be valid for one (1) year. An extension request may be submitted prior to the expiration of this approval. 2. A tree bank payment of $162,750.00 must be submitted prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. This amount is based upon the size and number of trees provided on the July 19, 2021 plans. If upon final inspection the size and/or number of trees does not reflect the plan, then the tree bank payment will be modified accordingly. 3. On-site lighting shall not be installed without review and approval of a proposed photometric plan by the City. 4. The applicant must provide to the City copies of the approvals from Seminole County for stormwater and right-of-way improvements prior to receiving approval of a City engineering permit. 5. Provide copies of all local, regional, state, and federal permits for the project to the City prior to commencement of development. 6. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed, or the site plan shall become null and void. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Tardif reviewed the parking requirements for the development. A general discussion ensued regarding the type of materials used for the perimeter walls, buffering, pedestrian connectivity, and location of the air conditioning units. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Tardif explained that any changes made to the impervious surface would require a site plan modification. He said the level of review for the site plan modification would depend on the change to the impervious surface calculation. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Tardif said he was not aware of any recent parking studies conducted by the City or any other local municipalities. A general discussion ensued regarding the parking calculations for the development and on -street parking.