CC 09/27/2021 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION Minutes of September 27, 2021 — Regular Meeting Page 13 of 18 Audience Participation: The following individuals came forward to address the City Commission regarding live streaming of City Commission Meetings: 1. Bill Hufford, 527 Queens Mirror Circle, thanked the Commission and staff for their analysis on the feasibility of live streaming, but expressed concerns about the cost of ongoing maintenance and upgrades and whether there would truly be enough benefit to justify the cost. 2. Emily Orey, (no address given), thanked the City Commission and staff for working to bring this presentation forward, and spoke in favor of live streaming of the meetings as it would provide greater accessibility, which she felt was incredibly important. 3. Rhonda Ovist, 220 South Embrey Dr., spoke in favor of live streaming of the meetings, noting that she was not concerned about the cost, and she did not think that ADA (Americans With Disabilities Act) compliancy issues should be used as an excuse not to do it. 4. Elizabeth Karoly, 1556 Elf Stone Drive (unincorporated Seminole County), appreciated the work that had gone into researching the issue, but did not see the feasibility of live streaming if there was not a component that included the capability for interaction. 5. Stephanie Fuller, 812 Rogers Court, spoke in support of live streaming of the City Commission meetings, noting that it would provide citizens another avenue for civic engagement, and would benefit those who were unable to attend the meetings in person due to health or other reasons. 6. Colleen Hufford, 527 Queens Mirror Circle, expressed concerns about what the possible recurring costs might be, including staffing and technical assistance, and whether live streaming would bring value to everyone or just a few. 7. Andy Searles, 1340 Queen Elaine Drive, shared that his personal experience in going to live streaming for his ministry had provided many positive things, including increasing outreach, communication, accessibility and engagement and he supported the City moving forward. No one else came forward Discussion: Discussion ensued during which each Commissioner gave individual input as to their thoughts and/or concerns regarding potential live streaming of City Commission meetings and each expressed either support for or non-support of live streaming. Commissioner Ararnendia: - Has had many conversations with different people over the past several months regarding the issue. - Expressed concerns that whether or not costs would increase after implementation was unknown. - Expressed concerns about ADA compliance issues and potential lawsuits, and whether funds could be better used for areas which would benefit the whole community and not just a few. - Shared some of his experiences while getting actively involved and engaged with the City, including physically attending meetings without the benefit of live streaming and volunteering on committees and boards. - Stated that the City is only approximately 7-8 square miles in size, and he felt that made it very accessible to its residents. - Expressed concerns again about the end cost and stated he felt it was not as simple as it may seem to be.