P & Z 10/09/2019 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dixon, Joni From: Edmund D Bakalla <ebakalla@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 7:41 AM To: Dixon, Joni; Ed B Email Subject: LPA 19-13 comments from P&Z meeting from Ed Bakalla EXTERNAL EMAIL: [Caution: Do not click on links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.] Joni, Here are my comments and thoughts. I am happy we are doing it this way or i would have held up the meeting till 1 Opm.:) Comments in order: "Transient lodging"- based on the definition does this category include any B&B, AirBnb, multi -family residences (flophouses) advertised in public (craiglists, etc.). A2. "Quality" "Sound"? Do these words mean current accepted "general planning standards"? — I would think there might be better words to use to be more direct in what the City wants? A3. "dynamic"? Are we using this as an antonym of "static" or "standard"? E. So we are saying the monthly (so they could do a 364 day agreement each year) rental of each room is permitted only one time a year? So they can do weekly rental to the same person for the whole year or 4 weeks rental at a time which is less than 1 month. It just appears the language might need to include adding language regarding guest not staying past a certain maximum time in the whole facility. The "number of days" in the facility for the whole year for a guest? Many hotels offer lodging to the manager/employee/housekeeping/hospitality on site? Is this exempted here in E2? F. "Amenities" — we discussed briefly at the meeting with examples but can we provide a definition with examples- The board might want to see that there be a list so it is clear what the Casselberry community considers "amenities". Can the board see a list of possible amenities and see if the board does not support certain types of amenities? Could add something like "and based on city manager approval or designate". I. No more than 8 people: I would like to see where we are getting this number from considering the maximum room occupancy is normally in effect for each room. I could see maximum of 6 people (2 adults and 4 children). Even if this a two bedroom or two queen bed setup with a couch... beyond 6 seems like a convention/party happening. Does this 8 come from some standard? Would the legally binding fire marshal maximum occupancy per each room be more direct and legally sound or is that more than 8? Definitions: Bed and Breakfast lodging: Are we defining it here for another part of the ordinance we including this as "transient lodging"? This does not appear to be anywhere on the additions/changes. Are we applying the ordinance change to