Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Campbell stated no. <br />The Special Magistrate asked if the owner for 214 Cannon Way was present. <br />Ilga Ocasio, 214 Cannon Way stated that they have been trying to work it out with the insurance and lawyers and will have <br />to sue the insurance. Ms. Ocasio advised that Morgan and Morgan have taken over her case, she had proof to show. <br />The Special Magistrate asked if the City was shown the information. The City then reviewed the document. <br />Mr. Campbell advised that the City's possession was that this case originated in July (2017) and the fines should be imposed <br />and run until the roof has been fixed. <br />The Special Magistrate read the law suit information and looked at the case status. A copy of the law suit was entered as <br />exhibit A. <br />Ms. Ocasio added that she had just lost her job and her husband in on social security, she has been trying her best to resolve <br />this case. <br />The Special Magistrate stated to his knowledge no one appeared at the October hearing and would have to pull <br />the minutes to verify. It was also stated that the Magistrate does not recall being made aware of the law suit at the <br />October hearing. <br />Ms. Ocasio stated she had given a copy. <br />There was a recess and the minutes were pulled. <br />The Special Magistrate reviewed the minutes. <br />Discussion. <br />The Special Magistrate advised that Ms. Ocasio would need to speak to her attorney and let them know she has <br />been cited for the roof damage, by the City. That is that much more the insurance company would be responsible <br />for because they have not repaired the roof. It is now a snowball effect and since Ms. Ocasio is seeing the insurance <br />company there is no point in giving any extra time. There no way to know when the repair will happen. <br />Finding of fact- The Special Magistrate made a finding in case 17-000485, 214 Cannon Way. The case came <br />before the Special Magistrate at the October 12, 2017 hearing for violation of roof maintenance; 3-10.3.A.4. The <br />property was found in violation and Ordered to come into compliance by rpm, January 11, 2018 or a fine of <br />$50.00 for each day of non-compliance would be imposed. Based on testimony and evidence, the property has <br />not come into compliance and the $50.00 per day fine was imposed. <br />CE -17-000759 1810 SR 436 <br />• Landscaping maintenance; ULDR Section 3-10.3.C.1 <br />Mark Campbell, Code Compliance Supervisor advised that at the November 9, 2017 hearing, the Special Magistrate found <br />this property to be in violation and a date of January 11, 2018 was given for compliance or a $50.00 per day fine would be <br />imposed. The property was found to be non-compliant on January 11, 2018, therefore the $50.00 per day fine should be <br />imposed. The property was inspected by the planning department and it was found that the owner had done the <br />landscaping but there is an issue with the sprinkler system. What was put in was dying or dead, and does not meet the <br />criteria to pass inspection. <br />21 Page <br />