My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CE 07/14/2016 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Code Enforcement Hearing Minutes
>
CEB Minutes Archives
>
2016 Code Enforcement Minutes
>
CE 07/14/2016 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2017 1:51:26 PM
Creation date
2/9/2017 1:51:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
7/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fine would be imposed. A follow-up _pection was conducted on July 14, 20 1, nd the property was found to <br />be non-compliant. The City requests that the fine of $50 per day fine be imposed. <br />The Special Magistrate looked at photos provided in the PowerPoint presentation. <br />The Special Magistrate asked if the owner of 400 Hibiscus Rd was present. There was no one present. <br />Finding of Fact- The Special Magistrate made a finding that this case # 15-01224 had come before him on June <br />9, 2016 for violation of ULDR Section 3-10.3. A(6) After hearing testimony and receiving evidence, a finding <br />of fact was issued and conclusions of law. The property 400 Hibiscus Rd was in violation of the aforementioned <br />code. It was ordered that property be brought into compliance by 1pm on June 23, 2016. Based on testimony <br />and photographs entered into evidence it was found that as of July 14, 2016 the property still has not come into <br />compliance, therefor it was ordered that a fine of $50.00 per day starting as of July 14, 2016 and will run <br />continue every day the violation continues to exist. <br />Accessory structure maintenance; ULDR Section 3-10.3 (C) (1) <br />CE -15-01225 400 Hibiscus Rd <br />Mark Campbell, Lead Code Compliance Officer advised that at the June 9, 2016 hearing the Special magistrate <br />found this property to be in violation and a date of June 23, 2016 was given for compliance or a $50 per day <br />fine would be imposed. A follow-up inspection was conducted on July 14, 2016 and the property was found to <br />be non-compliant. The City requests that the $50 per day fine be imposed. <br />The Special Magistrate looked at photos provided in the PowerPoint presentation. <br />The Special Magistrate asked if the owner of 400 Hibiscus Rd was present. There was no one present. <br />Finding of Fact- The Special Magistrate made a finding that this case# 15-01225 had come before him on June <br />9, 2016 for violation of ULDR Section 3-10.3. (C)(1) After hearing testimony and receiving evidence, a fmding <br />of fact was issued and conclusions of law. The property 400 Hibiscus Rd was in violation of the aforementioned <br />code. It was ordered that property be brought into compliance by 1pm on June 23, 2016. Based on testimony <br />and photographs entered into evidence it was found that as of July 14, 2016 the property still has not come into <br />compliance, therefor it was ordered that a fine of $50.00 per day starting as of July 14, 2016 and will continue <br />every day the violation continues to exist. <br />Fence maintenance; ULDR Section 3-10.3 (B) <br />CE -16-00258 236 Plaza Oval Dr <br />Mark Campbell, Lead Code Compliance Officer advised that at the June 9, 2016 hearing the Special magistrate <br />found this property to be in violation and a date of July 9, 2016 was given for compliance or a $50 per day fine <br />would be imposed. A follow-up inspection was conducted on July 9, 2016 and the property was found to be <br />non-compliant. The City requests that the $50 per day fine be imposed. <br />The Special Magistrate looked at photos provided in the PowerPoint presentation. <br />The Special Magistrate asked if the owner or representative of 236 Plaza Oval Dr was present. There was no <br />one present. <br />31 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.