|
'511cd M"VIS:
<br />ff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve CU 1617 to all= a 780 square loot sbed at
<br />North Winter Park Drive. Staff's recommendation is based on the findings of fact and conclusions of this
<br />I report dated December 14, 2016, and the following conditions.
<br />Au rnbEeyvmr <nwifienr mmtLe met'Itaecrx,WiJnm ir,dnde mernunmrag:
<br />i, AmbuildingPmsvtnill be requiredtu the proposal shed. the fWIu.L,g ase cu,ditiuu and/oritem. that nJI apld)' m zaidYmsvt'11Js list
<br />esseilsammc
<br />f. 'Htclocaaril5'dgn oCil,e Woposed shed lie along Maud zone AE, or ilre spedal flood Hanud ArealSFHAI. "H,e aPNionti: rerrutded
<br />a-,s—a an5'Pas6m aftheshcd Le du(uditno Ilaod.ur,e AE, sped6c candido' xi ll Lernd4flto L H daadngfhe 'ted
<br />Odor and t5is,g dosm the mrwm. Fa in,Ysu,'emos¢ tooth a4 a pueallJ'vritbin Jtn SW dal Ylo W HazaW Asea ISPHAt, fill
<br />mmplfanassiJa Cry o(Gusdbmy Cadeo( ieunc=s
<br />SMAwmhuRidg cmam46 is required 1lss md,sMdebuwt iPzmnomtltimmited conn Ellp,mva uJtYe
<br />dented aM docwtkntation prosided m Public Rohs as rceded (or<onyliance nith afiaptert6.
<br />H. No c on acti,iry o u mPaets a adjace u Wopenie dot u ant cowed fi)' aPWutnive eumtom u ocher —
<br />ii
<br />g mu are
<br />n m
<br />Ibe nofac soryxwcm( apemuned ariddn any wiliry es n(UEI.
<br />n. MPmWiatemc NrolilEdtd'uchuge, - and acdim wstbein d(enazallrimes. l}v mal'irdnde, L,n il
<br />Iirrvtdm,apPmPriaWyut,ffi rill krce, inletI ewPuan' tsmle, tc. PaJurefoappmpriaielymmagc
<br />Jrx as detvmusdby d,e Con nitssWeo1Nanaal l4suurea 0lfm�u1Gry Esgtnec, may resWtin p ,m o[a
<br />bWldngpomitaMastopmork order wdzudrJme Jot arefWtyreolved
<br />No adrme drainage vnPacn toadj+-..n Prope,Ja nrright ofrta>z are Pmrutlal
<br />No imtnm b Iaka ,craJmvts u v,umdurcms'uno Nasal huRm otc Pmsun=d
<br />No;mpacts b vd,id=wl6c or6ic5de/pehatrian safery ordmda6on an swell, ddemlks, u awlx are Pemdned
<br />,7LL Lsunne a(ab,ildingpermit doe scot authorize nitkn ilx public rightorma}eAM'<nmwcum avJws il,e publicrighv
<br />oaayrogWre a xemra�e pemif Jnnf� me cfrr�*u<<v u nmamnw.
<br />ro. hsuas,reufa6uildingPmmt,lov dviatethe appliemtfren rmnPliance niJs�ty Co,k.
<br />Issuarce of a6uildingPma[ doe swtabsiate the at9liom trcm the need m oLnin a}rylimLle pemua (romoJ,erj,aisdicriom.
<br />'fh defad,ed azcessu5' Nurimc ahall be laovd azleaa 75 (eelfrom the side WOPmS' line, a mLdmun o(I6 fxtf our Jse renin mumm,
<br />andazlran4feetfr uv an5'ott,eracressu5'sw,mresluafed on J,e subje<tleapct5'.
<br />'tl,e dcladted a<aszuy nmenaes6Jl rot eaceed )60 zgnam renin mrd shallna eauedthemo6ine height dJse sccidunc
<br />No hanrdous matariila shill bemed, stated orgmerated azfM site.a�
<br />'tfie demdred acassuysmtenae shall rotbe usut Cora nycommerdat orbfuirczs sti,iuca.
<br />Abd., a&Ass autrcnae rlWlswtbe medssa.Rd .d shalltieswt-fadide..idP ild d ffii.Mauwss d swceve.
<br />A fitvldng Pvndt shall be obtdned (run Jr CtymJdn Jvec mmJn and cotuwcJon shaE be <mnpteted miJ,in me STar of Jx date o(J,e
<br />12/27/2016
<br />2-6. 0): Conditional Use Criteria
<br />Scale andinf®sits The proposed sbed trill be 30'a 26'; totaling 780 sqn. e feet in sae. The subject property
<br />is appo.,—.0y.73 acres in size and has a current Open Space and Impervious Surface Ratio of
<br />approsamately 269'; pith the addition of the proposed shed, the property is still able to maintain the required
<br />50%Open Space and Impervious Surface Ratio. The Public Wads Department has renemcd the proposal
<br />and app,ows the development nith specific conditions; tbese conditions shall become conditions for Us
<br />tduse compatibflay. Accessorystructures — meant to be built to blend aesthetically tsith the main
<br />curie and adjacent properties. Although the proposed meta] sbed may not be ideal to blend aesthetically,
<br />slrucam, trill be set bad, far enough whereas not to be visible from the rigbt ofay. In general, accessory
<br />tures, specifically sheds are compatible with the nefg ab -b g properties and residential uses.
<br />site is suffident in sine and specifications to accommodate the proposed sbed. According the to proposed
<br />Stan the applicant is able to maintain all otthe selbarks required forthis proposal.
<br />e of nitigatim techniques. 'IL, applicant shall ensure that A Coy Engineer requirements are met as
<br />as all nereesaq setbacks are satisfied.
<br />No hazardous v,astes or materials shall be stored in the sbed.
<br />pliancewithappIicahlelaws and ordinances. Ifthe conditional use request is approved, the applicant
<br />obtain a build. permit from the City prior to construction. The applicant's permit submittal sball
<br />Sly with all applicable state and loml requirements.
<br />CU 16=18: 1275 & 1283 ,South U.S. High may 17-99
<br />Request dol- 4COP/,SRX
<br />
|