PZ 11/09/2016 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency November 9, 2016 Page 5 Mr. Bryan asked for a motion to address SPR 16-15. Mr. Phillips made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the major site plan application for a commercial retail store (SPR 16-15) based on the site plan dated September 27, 2016, the findings of fact and conclusions of the information provided in the staff report dated November 9, 2016, subject to the seven (7) conditions of approval outlined in the staff report and modifying condition number 4 that the photometric plan should be provided prior to issuance of the engineering permit. Mr. Lutz seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. A brief discussion ensued with the applicant regarding ensuring the photometric plan meets City Code. Eighth Item of Business: SP 16-03: Commercial Retail Store (09-21.30-5BM-OB00-0220, 09.21-30-5BM-OB00- 0230 and 09-21.30-5BM-OB00.0240). A replat for property being developed at the northeast corner of Seminola Boulevard and Lake Drive. Ms. Emily Hanna, Planner II, reviewed the information provided in staffs memorandum dated November 9, 2016, and a PowerPoint presentation to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission (a copy of the presentation is attached and made a part of the minutes). Ms. Hanna said staff requests the Planning and Zoning Commission review the "Commercial Retail Store" (SP 16-03), Replat, and provide a recommendation of approval to the City Commission. She said this recommendation is based upon the plat dated October 26, 2016, the findings of fact and conclusions of the staff report dated November 9, 2016, and the following condition: 1. The City Surveyor shall execute the signature block prior to recording of the replat. In response to the Commission's question, Ms. Hanna said the replat was originally for Lot 22 and Lot 23. She said there was a 25 -foot sliver of Lot 23 that was not attached to anything. Ms. Hanna said the City asked the applicant to revise the plat to combine the 25 feet of Lot 23 to Lot 24. In response to the Commission's question, Ms. Hanna explained at the time the staff report was completed Lot 24 was not included in the replat. Mr. Bryan asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Daniel Young, 132 NW 76th Drive, Gainesville, Florida came forward. The Commission had no questions for the applicant. Mr. Bryan asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. No one came forward.