PZ 06/11/2014 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency June 11, 2014 Page 3 the process for retaining specimen trees on sites and possible clarification to the wording of landowner referenced in Article XIV Tree Protection, Section 3 -14.1 Applicability. In response to the Commission's question regarding the period of time the property owner must guarantee survival of a retained or replacement tree in Section 3 -14.6, Ms. Regan said that the tree must be retained in perpetuity. The Commission noted that there was a conflict with the time frame within the Code for retaining trees. A general discussion ensued regarding adjusting the permitting fees due to the amount of additional work required by staff. In response to the Commission's question regarding the use of the St. John's River Water Management District watering requirements in lieu of the City requirements, Ms. Regan said that she would do some additional research on this item. A general discussion ensued regarding Section 3 -14.8 Tree replacement requirements with /without an approved landscape plan, the ability to use shrubs in lieu of trees for replacement purposes, requiring replacement trees planted in specific areas, and providing staff the flexibility to work with the applicant regarding replacement of shrubs in lieu of trees in certain situations. It was decided that staff would address tonight's questions and provide an ordinance for the landscape and tree protection for review at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Mr. Meadows asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Casselberry suggested the Commission evaluate the end result for tree replacement requirements. He said he didn't think that residential properties should be required to replace trees due to the cost. Mr. Casselberry said trees provide a value in reducing electricity costs. He said the asphalt at commercial sites heats up the air and shading the asphalt is a benefit. He felt that 30% to 40% canopy coverage for commercial sites would be good. Mr. Dave Henson, 233 Bridle Path, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Henson said that this is a work in progress and it will continue to be something that will need to be tweaked. Mr. Henson said he would like to see something in the Code for lots that have been cleared. Eighth Item of Business: Other Business