CE 01/08/2015 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Violations of ULDR Section 2- 8.5.1. on the subject property were first observed on July 29, 2013. On August 14, 2014, it was ordered that this property be brought in compliance on September 28, 2014, or be subject to a $25 per day fine. The subject violation was found to be corrected and the property in compliance of ULDR Section 2- 8.5.1. on November 4, 2014, and, therefore, a fine of $960.90 was imposed. The subject repeat violations were found on December 9 and 17, 2014. The subject property was found to be in compliance of ULDR Section 2 -8.5.1 on December 30, 2014, January 6, 2015, and January 8, 2015. Staff recommends a fine of $250 each day that the repeat violation had occurred. Chad Lingenfelter, Development Services Manager advised that we had this violation previously and there were some materials describing the boundaries of the property, which are also boundaries of where auto sales can occur. The plat from 1926 was shown. Mr. Lingenfelter described the boundary and legal description. The City contends there is a repeating violation, it has been observed these vehicular sales are not staying on the property, but wandering onto the next property and other properties further south. Mr. Lingenfelter described the vehicles on the property. Can Gulemy, property owner of 54 Scminola Blvd. The Special Magistrate asked if Mr. Gulerny had a response to what the City is saying about the property being in violation of the code. Mr. Gulemy stated yes, but he does not understand or accept this violation. A letter was received about this violation with pictures, showing what it's about. Mr. Gulerny stated he is the landlord of this property and accepts all the rules for 100 Seminola Blvd_ Mr. Gulerny advised that he wants the occupational license for this property, under his company name. Discussion continued. FINDING OF FACT: The Special Magistrate stated based on the above testimony of record, the property 54 Seminola Blvd was in repeat violation of the City Code 2 -8.5 1. The Original order was dated August 14, 2014, the property had come into compliance and a standing order with regard to repeat violation was entered. It was found that the subject property was in violation for between December 9'h and December 17t', 2014, all dates inclusive (9 days). A fine of $250 per day, for each of the 9 days, totaling $2,250, to be paid within 30 days of the date of the order. The Special Magistrate stated he understood the property owner's issues, but the property owner is ultimately responsible regardless of whom the property is leased to. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. PUBLIC CONLIMENT There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING The Special Magistrate adjourned the meeting at 7:41pm Date: 17 I y Date:` 4 j °age