CE 01/08/2015 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NEW CASES No tree permit, ULDR Section 3 -14.4 ® CE -14 -00795 OW Melody Ln John Cecil, Lead Code Compliance officer gave the following testimony. Property owner, Casselberry Investment Properties, LTD. , the volition was for ULDR Section 3- 14.4., Permit Required for Removal; Exemptions. A representative of the property owner, Lillian Casselberry, has requested a continuance so that she may be present to speak on this matter. The Special Magistrate advised he was aware there was a request for continuance for this case. John Cecil advised that he spoke with a representative of the property owner, Lilian Casselberry and they are out of state and wanted to be present at the time of the hearing, this is the reason for the continuance. FINDING OF FACT: The Special Magistrate stated based on the above testimony the motion for continuance will be granted to the next hearing on February 12, 2015. Swimming pool standards, ULDR Section 3 -10 • CE -14 -00949 8 Hitching Post Ln John Cecil, Lead Code Compliance officer gave the following testimony. Property owner, Deborah S. Zopp, the volition was for ULDR Section 3- 10.3.C.7., Swimming Pool Standards. The subject violation was found to be corrected and the property in compliance of ULDR Section 3- 10.3.C.7. on January 5, 2015, and, therefore, no Imes should be imposed. However, staff requests a standing order in case this violation is repeated. FINDING OF FACT: The Special Magistrate made a fording that the property had been in violation and came into compliance as of January 8, 2015, a standing order was entered for any violation of the same code on the same property within 5 days(years) of the date of the order. Repeat violations may be subject to a fore of up to $500 per day for each day of the violation. Carport, porch or patio storage, ULDR Section 3 -10.3 6 i CE -14 -01066 1400 Huntington Dr John Cecil, Lead Code Compliance officer gave the following testimony. Property owner, Joseph L. Wuerz and Donald L. Wuerz, the volition was for ULDR Section 3- 10.3.C.6., Carport, Front Porch, or Porte - cochere Use. The subject violation was found to be corrected and the property in compliance of ULDR Section 3- 10.3.C.6. on January 5, 2015, and, therefore, no fines should be imposed. However, staff requests a standing order in case this violation is repeated. FINDING OF FACT: The Special Magistrate made a finding that the property had been in violation and came into compliance as of January 8, 2015, a standing order was entered for any violation of the same code on the same property within 5 years of the date of the order. Repeat violations may be subject to a fore of up to $500 per day for each day of the violation. NEW CASE/REPEAT VIOLATION Increase in nonconformities prohibited, ULDR Section 2 -8.5 1. ® CE -14 -01275 54 Seminola Blvd John Cecil, Lead Code Compliance officer gave the following testimony. Property owner, Can GuIenay, Inc., the volition was for ULDR Section 2- 8.5.1., Increase in Nonconformities Prohibited. 3 1 P a g e